{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8","title":"哈贝马斯著作集 包容他者","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208153554","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8","id":"ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8","uuid":"ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8","title":"哈贝马斯著作集 包容他者","normalized_title":"哈贝马斯著作集包容他者","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208153554","isbns":["9787208153554"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":389,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%93%88%E8%B4%9D%E9%A9%AC%E6%96%AF%E8%91%97%E4%BD%9C%E9%9B%86%20%E5%8C%85%E5%AE%B9%E4%BB%96%E8%80%85","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":254,"pdf_page":263,"physical_index":263,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"821f6237e2ac51c19bbc127bef3256eead326028511833997af5dc0e14d2cb82"},"chapter":"包容他者","content":"种族灭绝，种族屠杀，多么感人的概念；我就有过切身体验：比如1945年对普鲁士一德意志政府官员的清洗。\n\n施米特对种族灭绝的理解可谓十分微妙，由此，他还进一步得出结论认为：\n\n“灭绝人性的犯罪”只是一切消灭敌人附加条款中最普通的一条。\n\n在其他地方还有这样的话：\n\n有灭绝人性的犯罪，也有捍卫人性的犯罪。灭绝人性的犯罪源于德国人，捍卫人性的犯罪则加于德国人。66\n\n这里使用的显然是另一种论据。贯彻世界公民权利，会导致歧视性的战争概念；这不再会仅仅被看作是对全面战争的错误反应，而是全面战争的根源。全面战争是“正义战争”的当代表达形式，这种战争当中必然贯穿着一种干预主义的人权政治：“关键在于，战争的总体性首先就属于战争的正义性。”67施米特就是这样来为道德普遍主义辩解的，并把论证由法律层面转移到了道德层面。在施米特看来，回归到古典国际法，就是为了避免全面战争。但是，我们始终无法理解的是，施米特是否认为，真正可恶的就是全面战争，也就是发动战争的非人性特征；或者说，施米特是否害怕战争自身失去其价值。但我们可以肯定的是，施米特在为《政治的概念》(DerBegriffdesPolitischen）撰写的附录中曾描述过战争在非军事领域中的全面扩展过程，他认为，全面战争才是真正为了保全民族：\n\n254\n\n包容他者","previous_page":253,"next_page":255}