{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8","title":"哈贝马斯著作集 包容他者","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208153554","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8","id":"ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8","uuid":"ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8","title":"哈贝马斯著作集 包容他者","normalized_title":"哈贝马斯著作集包容他者","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208153554","isbns":["9787208153554"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":389,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%93%88%E8%B4%9D%E9%A9%AC%E6%96%AF%E8%91%97%E4%BD%9C%E9%9B%86%20%E5%8C%85%E5%AE%B9%E4%BB%96%E8%80%85","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":273,"pdf_page":282,"physical_index":282,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"549e4c7496ea4a7104d9fa11152907cb4ecf04a94cd535171d204d54f261acb7"},"chapter":"包容他者","content":"性别角色和性别差异的分类涉及一个社会的文化自我理解的基本层面。直到今天，激进女权主义者才使我们意识到这种自我理解具有易错性，从本质上讲也是有争议的，因此亟须进行修正，必须澄清决定(一群）男人和女人的经验和生活境遇之间差异的方方面面。而男人和女人之间的这些差异对于保证建立在机会均等原则之上的主体行为自由有着重要意义。9所以说，妇女争取平等地位的斗争是一个极其出色的例子，它表明改变法律范式势在必行。现有的两种法律规范争执不休，围绕着的问题是，究竟应当通过私人竞争的主体自由还是通过福利官僚制的当事人所要求的客观上得到保障的利益来保护法律人格的自主性；但现在应当代之以一种程序主义的法律概念(prozeduralitischeRechtsauffassung)。根据这种法律概念，民主进程必须同时保障私域自主和公域自主：除非在公共讨论中那些涉及切身利益的人自己起来阐明并证明对于典型的平等或不平等永远都是事关重大的方方面面，否则，主体权利虽然应当保障妇女在私域中过一种自主的生活，却无法得到恰如其分的表达。平等公民的私域自主只有在他们积极行使其公共自主时才能得到保障。\n\n第四部分 人权——从全球和内政的角度看\n\n273","previous_page":272,"next_page":274}