{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8","title":"哈贝马斯著作集 包容他者","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208153554","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8","id":"ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8","uuid":"ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8","title":"哈贝马斯著作集 包容他者","normalized_title":"哈贝马斯著作集包容他者","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208153554","isbns":["9787208153554"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":389,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%93%88%E8%B4%9D%E9%A9%AC%E6%96%AF%E8%91%97%E4%BD%9C%E9%9B%86%20%E5%8C%85%E5%AE%B9%E4%BB%96%E8%80%85","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":279,"pdf_page":288,"physical_index":288,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"711ce8f9968e9cd433a9a8918ca4e754405ab5180250773237e359beb8324d4c"},"chapter":"包容他者","content":"我们一旦把某个问题当作权利问题来处理，就已经开始接手一种现代法律概念；仅仅由于概念的原因，现代法律就迫使我们不得不探讨法治国家的建筑术及其丰富的前提。这也有助于我们讨论不同文化群体之间的法律平等和平等承认问题。这些文化群体由于传统、生活方式、种族起源等不同而相互区别了开来。为了维护和发展起认同，它们的成员也要求与其他一切群体区别开来。\n\n3.法治国家的伦理特征\n\n从法律理论角度来看，文化多元主义提出的主要是有关法律制度和政治的伦理中立性问题。这里，我把举凡涉及美好生活或没有虚度的生活概念的问题，都称作“伦理问题”。至于某事（物）“对于所有人来讲是否都同样为善”，则是属于“道德观念”；伦理问题显然不能由“道德观念”来加以裁决；要想对伦理问题作出不偏不倚的评价，倒是应当立足于得力的价值判断，应当依靠一切群体的自我理解和未来的生活设计，也就是说，应当视它们共有的“善的观念”来加以判定。伦理问题强调的是第一人称，所以，从语法角度讲，伦理问题已经涉及了个体或群体的同一性。我想以加拿大制宪之争为例，主要根据公民从伦理一政治角度对民族所作的自我理解，来考察自由主义所提出的法律的伦理中立性要求。\n\n第四部分人权—从全球和内政的角度看\n\n279","previous_page":278,"next_page":280}