{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8","title":"哈贝马斯著作集 包容他者","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208153554","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8","id":"ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8","uuid":"ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8","title":"哈贝马斯著作集 包容他者","normalized_title":"哈贝马斯著作集包容他者","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208153554","isbns":["9787208153554"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":389,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%93%88%E8%B4%9D%E9%A9%AC%E6%96%AF%E8%91%97%E4%BD%9C%E9%9B%86%20%E5%8C%85%E5%AE%B9%E4%BB%96%E8%80%85","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ab07c774-3ed2-48d8-8672-5c17d147d9d8/search"},"page":{"printed_page":356,"pdf_page":365,"physical_index":365,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"6ff0af3cfd763f934017563940c26b7221c0d289bcbdf24a35186e39ad44b297"},"chapter":"包容他者","content":"— (1990), “Jürgen Habermas on Law and Morality: Some Critical Comments”, Theory, Culture and Society, 7: 105–111.\n\nWiggers, J. H. (1987), “Contract en Rede: Hegel, Rawls en Habermas over de Grondslag van de Politieke Filosofie\", Rechtsilosofie enRechtstheorie, 16: 47–70.\n\n2.3 话语伦理学与法\n\nAlexy,Robert (1992),\"A Discourse-Theoretical Conception of Practical Reason\", Ratio Juris,5: 231–251.\n\n— (1993), \"Justification and Application of Norms”, Ratio Juris, 6: 157–170. Andersen, Hans (1990), “Morality in Three Social Theories: Parsons, Analytical Marxism and Habermas”, Acta Sociologica, 33: 321–339.\n\nApel, Karl-Otto (1988), Diskurs und Verantwortung: Das Problem des Übergangs zur postkonventionellen Moral, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.\n\nApel, Karl-Otto and Kettner, Matthias (1992, eds.), Zur Anwendung der Diskursethik in Politik, Recht und Wissenschaft, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.\n\nBaynes, Kenneth (1991), The Normative Grounds of Social Criticism: Kant, Rawls and Habermas, Albany NY: State University of New York Press.\n\nBelliotti, Raymond A. (1989), \"Radical Politics and Nonfoundational Morality\", International PhilosophicalQuarterly, 29: 33.\n\nBenhabib, Seyla and Dallmayr, Fred (1990, eds.), The Communicative Ethics Controversy, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.\n\nBraun, Carl (1988), “Diskurstheoretische Normenbegrüudung in der Rechtswissenschaft\", Rechtstheorie, 19: 238-261.\n\n356\n\n包容他者","previous_page":355,"next_page":357}