{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ae053936-f6b1-488b-8973-bb2332d1be14","title":"数字技术研究","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787308182003","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ae053936-f6b1-488b-8973-bb2332d1be14","id":"ae053936-f6b1-488b-8973-bb2332d1be14","uuid":"ae053936-f6b1-488b-8973-bb2332d1be14","title":"数字技术研究","normalized_title":"数字技术研究","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787308182003","isbns":["9787308182003"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":790,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ae053936-f6b1-488b-8973-bb2332d1be14","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ae053936-f6b1-488b-8973-bb2332d1be14/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ae053936-f6b1-488b-8973-bb2332d1be14/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ae053936-f6b1-488b-8973-bb2332d1be14","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ae053936-f6b1-488b-8973-bb2332d1be14/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ae053936-f6b1-488b-8973-bb2332d1be14/search"},"page":{"printed_page":"121 / 177","pdf_page":201,"physical_index":201,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"1f04d6ae86fa3f9f78f696d19cc3e53a0eb26e17e91e5869a7542e08a2b2a619"},"chapter":"第8章 技术批判理论","content":"第8章 技术批判理论\n\n引 言\n\n技术批判理论认为，技术不是独立于社会的，而是要适应其所处的社会与政治环境。由于技术处于自身服务并为之贡献的社会政治秩序中，因而技术不可能是中立的，也不可能包含某种单一的“本质”。本文将向读者介绍一种新颖的实践框架，将技术批判理论用作数字技术研究领域的定性研究与多方法研究的基础(Feenberg，1991,1995,1999,2002)。技术批判理论源于马尔库塞对法兰克福学派批判理论的解释，具体体现为建构主义者对特定技术、产品与系统的分析。\n\n本章首先概述了技术批判理论试图调和的几种哲学立场，继而提出一个双层框架来分析技术与技术体系的社会政治维度。该框架由两个层次组成，在基础层次，各个物体与人物的情境信息被隐去以明确其可供性；到了第二个层次，物体与人物再次被赋予自然、技术、社会与文化环境内容。文章接着介绍几个关键术语，其中包括技术编码与形式偏见等概念，用以揭示能够反映普遍存在于设计过程中的各种价值观与信念的技术特性，构成要设计成技术本身的未经检验的文化假设的基础。另外，文章会将民主合理化概念作为一种分析工具，用于理解技术水平略弱的群体如何通过用户创新与公共干预来叫板技术编码。文章的剩余部分简要描述了技术批判理论在信息技术研究中的三个应用案例：Minitel、在线教育、大型多用户在线游戏(MMOGs)。\n\n121\n\n177","previous_page":200,"next_page":202}