{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ae053936-f6b1-488b-8973-bb2332d1be14","title":"数字技术研究","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787308182003","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ae053936-f6b1-488b-8973-bb2332d1be14","id":"ae053936-f6b1-488b-8973-bb2332d1be14","uuid":"ae053936-f6b1-488b-8973-bb2332d1be14","title":"数字技术研究","normalized_title":"数字技术研究","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787308182003","isbns":["9787308182003"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":790,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ae053936-f6b1-488b-8973-bb2332d1be14","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ae053936-f6b1-488b-8973-bb2332d1be14/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ae053936-f6b1-488b-8973-bb2332d1be14/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ae053936-f6b1-488b-8973-bb2332d1be14","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ae053936-f6b1-488b-8973-bb2332d1be14/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ae053936-f6b1-488b-8973-bb2332d1be14/search"},"page":{"printed_page":"166 / 245","pdf_page":269,"physical_index":269,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"1f82eb9b77295eccffdf3b14cb8389f7827b163bca9c3e580479addbe83bb424"},"chapter":"第10章 人机交互中的具身理论","content":"地理学者还研究了人造环境，对当前的设计与建筑活动提出了批判。雷尔夫(Relph，1981)集中关注了风景与人文主义关注间不断变化的关系，并着重研究了现代人造环境。通过体验将意义与空间结构相联系，意味着当前规划的着眼点与实践的剧烈变化(Crang，1998)。\n\n另一项哲学遗产是人文地理学者对场所概念的细致分析，以及他们为理解场所意义的构成所做的努力。比如，雷尔夫(Relph，1976)指出了他所谓的场所特性的“原始素材”。\n\n·物理外观：某个环境的结构、布局、直观的特性。\n\n·活动：社会活动、经济功能、日常工作等。\n\n·意义：源于过去事件与当前情境的特定意义。意义虽然根植于环境中，但并非物理环境的属性，而是人类意图与体验的特性。\n\n在雷尔夫看来，“场所的这三个基础构成要素是无法彼此减缩的，而是交织在人们对某个场所的体验中，彼此不可分离”(Relph，1976：47一48)。不过，按照雷尔夫的观点，场所还有另一个重要的无形层面，将这些内容联系并囊括进来，他将其称作一个地方的风气(Relph，1976)。他指出，当我们来到某个地方时，是能够感受到这个地方的风气的，当地人赋予其共同的意义或符号(Seamon,1996)。\n\n另一些研究人员考察了是否存在共同的普遍存在的场所意义。事实上，像“地方风气”这样的构成元素是难以确定与辨认的。场所对某些人或特定群体可能具有意义。但我们难以确定其是否与人们对这个地方的普遍感觉有关，或者与文化遗存或社会实践等层面相关。\n\n布迪莫(Buttimer)对风气一词进行了拆析，试图找出场所的意义可以从哪些方面来赋予：\n\n第11章 数字技术研究的空间与场所:理论概述\n\n166\n\n245","previous_page":268,"next_page":270}