{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ae053936-f6b1-488b-8973-bb2332d1be14","title":"数字技术研究","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787308182003","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ae053936-f6b1-488b-8973-bb2332d1be14","id":"ae053936-f6b1-488b-8973-bb2332d1be14","uuid":"ae053936-f6b1-488b-8973-bb2332d1be14","title":"数字技术研究","normalized_title":"数字技术研究","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787308182003","isbns":["9787308182003"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":790,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ae053936-f6b1-488b-8973-bb2332d1be14","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ae053936-f6b1-488b-8973-bb2332d1be14/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ae053936-f6b1-488b-8973-bb2332d1be14/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ae053936-f6b1-488b-8973-bb2332d1be14","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ae053936-f6b1-488b-8973-bb2332d1be14/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ae053936-f6b1-488b-8973-bb2332d1be14/search"},"page":{"printed_page":299,"pdf_page":323,"physical_index":323,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"6209f8197e8472fab226aaa87e9362adcfa318b81902316c829973f88fe2d191"},"chapter":"第13章 数字研究的民族志方法","content":"这篇文章引起了强烈的反响。以书面文字为例，一篇关于该文章的博文总结到：“我愿意参与辩论，我觉得可以从讨论中学到很多，但我希望这种争论是文明的，是围绕一套原则来进行的，不仅要尊重我们讨论的作品，也要尊重写出这些作品的学者。”就在这次会议上，这篇文章受到了严厉的批评。这场争论属于典型的民族志研究之争，因为民族志研究的要求如此之严苛，往往推动着争论围绕民族志问题而展开，而不是对这些研究本身。\n\n不过，这种争论的确清晰地确立了民族志在人机交互项目中的核心位置。正如本章开头所提到的，无论围绕民族志有怎样的争议(即便人机交互中缺乏实际的民族志研究)，民族志已肯定确立了其在理解技术、交互及更广义生活方面的核心地位。\n\n参考文献：\n\n第13章 数字研究的民族志方法\n\n299","previous_page":298,"next_page":300}