{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","uuid":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","normalized_title":"marxandtheconceptofhistoricaltime","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":200,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Marx%20and%20the%20Concept%20of%20Historical%20Time","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/search"},"page":{"printed_page":1,"pdf_page":5,"physical_index":5,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"e60444178c5d17c808402d255fcb7a89fa926bd1554952de7ebe753b4a4a6718"},"chapter":"马克思与历史时间概念","content":"导论《马克思:时间与历史\n\n时间经济。所有的节约最终都归结于此。1\n\n关于时间与历史的关系，马克思的著作告诉了我们什么?简而言之，这篇论文坚持的，是相当少的，同时又是相当多的。很少，因为在马克思的全部作品中，没有任何地方对这种关系进行持续的研究;相当多，因为这些作品构成了最伟大的资源之一，如果在很大程度上仍未开发，可以用来更广泛地理解现代欧洲哲学传统中的这种关系。当然.自马克思时代以来，这种关系就在马克思主义内部得到了检验(沃尔特·本雅明、路易斯·阿尔都塞、让-保罗·萨特和恩斯特·布洛赫的作品最为突出examples²)，但事实仍然是，马克思对我们理解这种关系的贡献在很大程度上仍然是黑暗的。本文试图揭示这一贡献，并通过历史时间的概念来做到这一点。广义地说，这是一个不仅记录了时间与历史的关系，而且记录了时间与历史之间历史性变化的关系的概念。在马克思的思想中，没有现成的历史时间概念。用阿尔都塞的话来说，他从来没有给我们提供过“历史时间概念的大纲”。然而，本文认为，从马克思的著作中可以系统地构建出一个历史时间的概念。\n\n如果说有哪一部作品是本论文的灵感来源，那就是《德意志意识形态》3。这篇论文的前提是，内在存在着某种类似于“唯物主义历史观”的东西\n\n1 Karl Marx, Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy (Rough Draft) [1857-8]\n\n(hereafter Grundrisse), trans. Martin Nicolaus (London and New York: Penguin Books, 1993), 173. 2See, in particular, Walter Benjamin, On the Concept of History' [1940], trans. Harry Zohn, in Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, Volume 4, 1938-1940, ed. Howard Eiland and Michael W. Jennings (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003), 389-400; Louis Althusser, The Errors of Classical Economics: an Outline for a Concept of Historical Time' , in Louis Althusser and Étienne Balibar, Reading Capital [1968], trans. Ben Brewster (London: Verso, 1997), 91-118; Jean-Paul Sartre, Critique of Dialectical Reason, Volume 1: Theory of Practical Ensembles [1960] (hereafter CDR 1), trans. Alan Sheridan-Smith (London and New York: Verso, 2004); and Ernst Bloch, Nonsynchronism and the Obligation to its Dialectics' [1932], trans. Mark Ritter, New German Critique 11 (Spring 1977), 22-38. 'Nonsynchronism’ is a translation of the German word Ungleichzeitigkeit, which is better (and more literally) rendered as non-sametimeliness’ . This essay is also published in Ernst Bloch, Heritage of Our Times [1935], trans. Neville and Stephen Plaice (Berkeley: The University of California Press, 1990).\n\n3The English language edition of The German Ideology used in this thesis is Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, The German Ideology [1845-6] (hereafter GI), trans. S. W. Ryazanskaya (London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1965). When the translation of passages within this and other English language editions of\n\n1","previous_page":null,"next_page":2}