{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","uuid":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","normalized_title":"marxandtheconceptofhistoricaltime","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":200,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Marx%20and%20the%20Concept%20of%20Historical%20Time","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/search"},"page":{"printed_page":100,"pdf_page":104,"physical_index":104,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"253394033671aa3b468adb7ea9811ef30aa17b66b9634658c98a5b8c5aad3cd6"},"chapter":"第三章劳工向何处去？","content":"然而，本章的目的并不是简单地，甚至不是主要地证明抽象劳动的概念是一般思维劳动的条件。6它最重要的目的实际上是系统地检查，由于抽象劳动使“一般劳动”变得可理解，复杂而丰富的概念是“抽象劳动”本身，其核心是一个复杂而丰富的一—如果不发达的话一一对时间化的解释。事实上，抽象劳动和具体劳动之间的时间辩证法可以说是马克思对时间哲学的最大贡献，这一贡献还远未完全实现。为了预测下一章的内容，我们之所以如此关注抽象劳动，是因为如果抽象劳动是一般思维劳动的条件，那么它也必然是思考唯物主义历史观的必要条件(但不是唯一条件)。因此，这一章是必要的第一步，以确定前一章的推测性提议和下一章试图证明的内容:反对萨特，有一个总化和时间化历史的总化者。它就是资本。因此，虽然历史在本章中没有突出表现，但这并不意味着抽象劳动在任何意义上都“在”历史之外，或者同时构成和表达抽象劳动的交换关系在某种程度上“在”历史时间之外。恰相反。抽象劳动和商品交换关系完全处于历史和历史时间之内，正是因为它们构成了历史和历史时间。它们一一只有在第4章和结束语之后才能完全理解这种说法一一是历史时间生产的历史本体论基础。因此，与许多所谓“系统辩证法”文献的观点相反，资本主义交换关系不仅是一种历史的关系，而且是一种历史化的关系，因此，历史时间在逻辑上和实际上都是内在于价值形式的系统发展的。8实现这一认识的一个关键维度是对马克思“必要”概念的系统研究，这也是本章第二部分所关注的，在概述了抽象劳动的总体性和暂时性力量之后。\n\n6 The question is also: if abstract labour is the condition of thinking labour in general, is it the condition of thinking Sartre' s praxis' ? Heidegger' s‘Dasein' ? The historical condition that makes, we might go so far as to say, the existential-phenomenological subject possible?\n\n7Chapter 4 concentrates exclusively on the materialist concept of history, but it raises the question of whether capital is the condition of thinking the modern, post-Enlightenment conception of history more generally.\n\nSystematic Dialectics' does not grasp capital as the condition of thinking history, and hence does not think the systematic properly. Statements such as the following (which is representative of Systematic Dialectics) are thus misguided: the exchanges outlined in the first chapter of Capital are not historical but logical.’ Stavros Tombazos, Time in Marx: The Categories of Time in Marx's Capital (Chicago: Haymarket Books, 2014), 62. This standpoint is common, and extends beyond Systematic Dialectics. In his Kantian rereading of commodity exchange as the a priori synthetic matrix of the social, Sohn-Rethel states that the exchange abstraction excludes everything that makes up history, human and even natural history' , and that through the exchange relationtime becomes unhistorical time.' Sohn-Rethel, Intellectual and Manual Labour: a Critique of Epistemology, 48-9, 56.\n\n100","previous_page":99,"next_page":101}