{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","uuid":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","normalized_title":"marxandtheconceptofhistoricaltime","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":200,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Marx%20and%20the%20Concept%20of%20Historical%20Time","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/search"},"page":{"printed_page":111,"pdf_page":115,"physical_index":115,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"966d01c04563a3177e24de614939550445baac2d27b667317090283f7f3d23f0"},"chapter":"第三章劳工向何处去？","content":"抽象劳动的时间化，同时也是它的总化力量。“社会劳动”、“总劳动力”、“普遍社会劳动”等—一在《贡献》和《资本论》中反复出现的表达，必须被理解为抽象劳动的同义词—一是萨特式意义上的综合概念。它们的统一就是它们的分化过程，这是一个辩证的事实，马克思把具体劳动定性为抽象劳动的“纯粹器官”，这一点最基本地表达了出来。这样，用时间来衡量的劳动，的确似乎不是不同个人的劳动，相反，不同的劳动个人似乎只是这种劳动的器官。64换句话说，个人的劳动行为是总体化和时间化的—一它具有统一性——因为它是总体化的，而且\n\n58 Tombazos, Time in Marx, 4.\n\n59 Postone’ s historical sketch of abstract time’ comes dangerously close to conflating abstract labourtime with clock-time. See Postone, Time, Labor, and Social Domination, 200-16.\n\n60 Heidegger, BT, 466. Recall that world-time’ and ordinary time' are not necessarily inauthentic, that, for Heidegger, originary temporality' is not the sole domain of authentic temporality'\n\n61 As Tomba says:The clock measures the labour-time concretely performed in production, while the time of abstract labour objectivised in the same commodity as socially-necessary labour -thus, as exchange-value – has a social measure, given by money. The first temporality is measured by the capitalist or by his overseers with the stopwatch in his right hand and the Principles of Scientific Management in the left; the second temporality is, instead, regulated on the global markets.' Tomba, Marx's Temporalities, 103.\n\n62 Marx, Contribution, 49.\n\n63 The essential function of money-capital is to overcome its own limit, the contradiction between its own quality (the quintessence of all use-values’ (Marx, Grundrisse, 270), viz. infinite general wealth) and the necessity of its quantification (it is only ever a definite amount of money). This dialectic of infinitude and finitude is the historical-ontological basis of (modern) clock-time.\n\n64Marx, Contribution, 30. Or: the abstractly general counts not as a property of the concrete, sensibly real, but on the contrary the sensibly concrete counts as the mere form of appearance or definite form of realisation of the abstractly general.’ Karl Marx, quoted in Arthur, The New Dialectic and Marx's Capital, 46.\n\n111","previous_page":110,"next_page":112}