{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","uuid":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","normalized_title":"marxandtheconceptofhistoricaltime","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":200,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Marx%20and%20the%20Concept%20of%20Historical%20Time","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/search"},"page":{"printed_page":119,"pdf_page":123,"physical_index":123,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"acb08ce29f014e0fa1085d5ecaf582762ff12cfd8e491eea65f4b54517fba18f"},"chapter":"第三章劳工向何处去？","content":"他现在强调的是，个人需要的满足是在简单流通之外进行的，而满足这些需要的手段的创造恰恰是在作为资本的货币流通内部进行的。与简单的商品流通不同，作为资本的货币流通不仅以满足个人需要的手段为前提，而且以满足个人需要的手段为前提。97再一次，我们面临着劳动力商品化的特殊重要性。它不仅规定了在循环C-M-C的特定实例内的行为(即劳动力的出售、具体劳动行为和工资与生活资料的交换)只有在循环M-C-M(资本的最终循环)内才是现实的;为了卖而买)，但是，只要它导致个人需求的满足，每个C-M-C实例中的每个行为只在M-C-M'中是实际的。总而言之，C-M-C的物质性是以M-C-M’为前提的，因此，作为历史行为的具体劳动的总化和时间化能力是以抽象劳动的总化和时间化能力为基础的，或者从劳动力的购买角度来看，劳动力所生产的劳动。用萨特的话来说，抽象劳动的总化和时间化不是因为它是由人类的需要驱动的，而是因为它在内部将这种需要转化——扭曲——为紧急性。因此，对于工人来说(回到《批判》中先前引用的两段话)，“未来支配着现在，因为这个未来严格地将自己与过去等同起来”(98)，“要实现的未来已经被制造成机械惯性.以超越过去存在的方式。”99作为一个“活的有机体”，资本的自我更新是通过这种紧急的暂时性来表达的，这种暂时性量化了人类的需要。如果，正如前一章所论证的那样，人类的需要将“死亡”作为“时间性将自身时间化”的存在限制的基础，这样，行为将自身时间化为一种“朝向需要的存在”，那么，急迫性构成了资本主义对这种，据此，“时间价值’的本体论基础”被简化为个体工人所能活的年数、月数、日数等。100尽管事实上一一事实上正是因为一一资本对他或她的再生产漠不关心，而不是把他或她作为劳动力的某种社会总和的一部分。101.这对唯物主义的历史观有重要的影响。正如下一章所确立的，《资本论》是历史的主体(这与《资本论》是同义的)\n\n97 As Tombazos shows, Marx' s understanding of the difference between simple circulation and the circulation of money-capital is indebted to the transition from chemism to teleology in Hegel' s Logic. See Tombazos, Time in Marx, 75-9. Unlike the chemical process (simple circulation), the teleological process (capital) not only presupposes but posits the moments of its self-renewal\n\n98 Sartre, CDR 1, 82.\n\n99 Ibid. 235.\n\n100 Marx' s concept of capital could well be understood as a dialectic of mortality (in both its existential and chronological registers) and immortality, inasmuch as the immortality which money strove to achieve by setting itself negatively against circulation, by withdrawing from it, is achieved by capital, which preserves itself precisely by abaņdoning itself to circulation’ , and value is capital only as self-immortalising and self-multiplying value.' Marx, Grundrisse, 261, 639.\n\n101 Osborne, Marx and the philosophy of time’, 20.\n\n119","previous_page":118,"next_page":120}