{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","uuid":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","normalized_title":"marxandtheconceptofhistoricaltime","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":200,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Marx%20and%20the%20Concept%20of%20Historical%20Time","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/search"},"page":{"printed_page":164,"pdf_page":168,"physical_index":168,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"f7058e0743c8ce8eeb91c143dbb9d38d7ebefc15eec738c51c5e37f133a77a82"},"chapter":"第四章《资本论》:思考历史的条件","content":"依赖于资本生产过程的自动特性也可能起到纠正“系统辩证法”的主要观点的作用，正如第三章所指出的那样，系统地将历史和历史时间排除在马克思系统辩证法的领域之外。具体来说，它可能有助于这样一种意义，正如该领域的一些学者已经论证的那样，马克思对黑格尔《本质-逻辑》的挪用标志着《资本论》和《逻辑学》之间最重要的同源性。本论文认为，这种批判性的挪用使我们能够把握诸如以下段落的基本历史可理解性，这些段落与前面的段落一样，包含在《政治批判大纲》的“机器片段”中：\n\n在机器中，物化劳动本身不仅以产品或作为劳动资料使用的产品的形式出现，而且以生产力本身的形式出现…知识和技能的积累，社会大脑的一般生产力(des gesellschaftlichen Gehirns)的积累，因此被吸收到资本中，作为与劳动相对立的，因而表现为资本的属性，更具体地说，表现为固定资本的属性，只要它作为一种真正的生产资料进入生产过程……在机器中，知识表现为异己的、外在的;而活劳动则被纳入了自我激活的对象化劳动之下。工人表现为多余的，因为他的行动不是由资本的需要决定的[die bed<s:1> rfnisse des Kapitals].94\n\n与前面引用的对应部分一样，这段话使我们能够把握资本自我扩张与唯物主义历史观之间的本质关系，唯物主义历史观的缩影是“自我激活的客观劳动”表现为“生产力本身”。然而，在这里同样重要的，也是我们现在要考察的，是除了自动化(尽管与自动化不可分离)之外，构成增值过程和真实包容的另一个维度的东西，因此，它与自动化一起，确保资本作为思维历史的条件。这一特征就是异化。\n\n93 See, in parțicular, Tony Smith, Hegel, Marx and the Comprehension of Capitalism' , and Riccardo Bellofiore, 'Lost in Translation: Once Again on the Marx-Hegel Connection' , both of which appear in Marx's Capital and Hegel's Logic: A Reexamination, ed. Fred Moseley and Tony Smith.\n\n94Marx, Grundrisse der Kritik der politischen Ökonomie, 594-95 (Grundrisse, 694-95). The social brain' in this passage dovetails with the physiological dimension of Marx’ s concept of abstract labour highlighted in the previous chapter.\n\n164","previous_page":163,"next_page":165}