{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","uuid":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","normalized_title":"marxandtheconceptofhistoricaltime","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":200,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Marx%20and%20the%20Concept%20of%20Historical%20Time","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/search"},"page":{"printed_page":171,"pdf_page":175,"physical_index":175,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"25367bfbbbd77dd65f7fa55fbdb281059adc2a2ceba9d09879b2c0a29b2c3ee8"},"chapter":"第四章《资本论》:思考历史的条件","content":"4.1.4 所谓原始积累(original Accumulation)\n\n自动化和异化构成了资本的生产过程可以被确立为思考唯物主义历史观的条件的两条轴线。然而，如果不考察所谓的原始积累(die sogenannte urspr<e:1> ngliche Akkumulation)112,即《资本论》第一卷的最后一部分,这一章就不完整。马克思的原始积累概念是对政治经济学中“先前积累”地位的直接、批判性回应——首先是亚当·斯密的《国富论》113——但更根本的是，它也是对构成资本生产过程的看似循环的逻辑的对抗;即：“资本的积累以剩余价值为前提;剩余价值以资本主义生产为前提;资本主义生产的前提是商品生产者手中有大量的资本和劳动力，也就是说资本的积累。在这个假定的循环的基础上一一它使这个表面上无缝的循环得以存在，但正如我们将看到的，它被从循环中抹去了一一是资本的原始积累。在嘲笑反对政治经济学告诉自己的道德故事的“平淡的孩子气”115时——例如。资本主义起源于“节俭的精英”与“懒惰的流氓”之间的差异，后者在“放荡的生活”中挥霍他们的钱一—马克思向他的读者呈现了原始积累的系统描述，其中记录了这样一个事实：\n\n112 Primitive accumulation’ is of course the predominant English language translation of ursprüngliche Akkumulation. In contrast to this, this thesis argues that originary’ is a better rendition of ursprüngliche than primitive' , first and foremost because primitive accumulation' conjures up, as Osborne suggests, a nineteenth-century anthropological imagery, which would consign the process to a past time; or at least, identifies its methods with those of pre-history.\" How to Read Marx, 104-5. As Osborne notes, primitive accumulation’ obscures the contribution that Marx' s ursprüngliche Akkumulation makes to the concept of the origin -the Ursprung -in the German philosophical tradition more generally. Ibid. 105. Thus originary accumulation might be grasped as constitutive of a kind of originary temporality' , in ways that converge with and radically depart from Heidegger' s use of the term. Finally, originary' is preferable to original’ , because the former registers the ongoing constitutive function of originary accumulation, and hence the sense in which, as we will see, capital cannot exist without it.\n\n113 Without doubt, Michael Perelman’ s The Invention of Capitalism: Classical Political Economy and the Secret History of Primitive Accumulation (Durham: Duke University Press, 2000) is the preeminent investigation of politiçal economy' s simultaneous support and dismissal of originary accumulation. The so-called' within so-called originary accumulation' registers Marx’ s direct response to political economy, but it also, this thesis suggests, can be extended to the permanence of originary accumulation within capitalism.\n\n114Marx, Capital 1, 873.\n\n115 Ibid. After Jason Read, this tale is the idealized memory of an individual çapitalist' s accumulation.' Jason Read, Primitive Accumulation: the Aleatory Foundation of Capitalism' , Rethinking Marxism 14:2 (Summer 2002), 27. As Read points out, this is the context of Balibar’ s comment that the analysis of primitive accumulation thus brings us into the presence of the radical absence of memory which characterises history (memory being only the reflection of history in certain pre-determined sites – ideology or even law – and as such, anything but a faithful reflection).' Balibar, Elements for a Theory of Transition' , 283.\n\n171","previous_page":170,"next_page":172}