{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","uuid":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","normalized_title":"marxandtheconceptofhistoricaltime","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":200,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Marx%20and%20the%20Concept%20of%20Historical%20Time","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/search"},"page":{"printed_page":172,"pdf_page":176,"physical_index":176,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"5283f5855b03f96067f92ae8c6aa733021585c3e870497bd497d30ce535ff054"},"chapter":"第四章《资本论》:思考历史的条件","content":"“在真实的历史中，……征服、奴役、抢劫、谋杀，简而言之，暴力(Gewalt)扮演了最重要的角色。”116他用以下术语总结了这种积累:\n\n因此，创造资本关系的过程只能是使工人同他自己的劳动条件的所有权分离的过程;这是一个进行两种转化的过程，社会的生活资料和生产资料转化为资本，直接生产者转化为雇佣劳动者。因此，所谓原始积累，无非是生产者和生产资料分离的历史过程。它之所以表现为“原始的”(Ererscheint als“urspr<e:1> nglich”),是因为它构成了资本的史前(Vorgeschichte)，以及与资本相适应的生产方式的史前(117)\n\n正如一些评论家令人信服地论证18的那样，马克思的原始积累概念将资本积累的基本逻辑——如果不是基本逻辑的话——带到了中心舞台:分离逻辑[Scheidung]。这种分离(生产者和生产条件之间的分离，也就是雇佣工人和资本家之间的分离)，正如马克思在他的著作中所说的那样，构成了“资本的实际形成过程”和“资本的概念”。’120\n\n对原始积累的传统解读——尽管越来越不那么传统—一是从历史分期的角度来理解这一概念的，也就是说，这种积累被解读为按时间顺序不同的历史时间跨度，几个世纪前，资本主义产生了。与将形式包容理解为历史上“先于”的真实包容的概念非常相似，在这种解读中，原始积累不仅是历史分期的范畴，而且是历史过渡的范畴:它包含了(15th-18th世纪英国是原型)从封建主义到资本主义的过渡时期，因此在资本主义在世界舞台上确立自己之后或多或少的“结束”。121This\n\n116Marx, Kapital 1, 742 (Capital 1, 874).\n\n117 Marx, Kapital 1, 742 (Ċapital 1, 874-75). This historical act is the historical genesis of capital, the historical process of separation which transforms the conditions of labour into capital and labour into wagelabour. This provides the basis for capitalist production.' Marx, Theories of Surplus-Value, Part 3, 315.\n\n118 See, in particulr, Massimo De Aņgelis, Marx and primitive accumulation: The continuous character of capital' 's “enclosures' , The Commoner, Volume 2 (September 2001),\n\nhttp://www. commoner. org. uk/02deangelis. pdf (accessed 21 May 2015), and Werner Bonefeld,The Permanence of Primitive Accumulation: Commodity Fetishism and Social Constitution' , The Commoner Volume 2 (September 2001), http://www.commoner.org.uk/02bonefeld.pdf (accessed 21 May 2015).\n\n119Marx, Theorien über den Mehrwert, Dritter Teil, 414 (Theories of Surplus-Value, Part 3, 422).\n\n120 Marx, Capital 3, 354. See also Marx, Theories of Surpluş-Value, Part 3, 311.\n\n121 This is, at least at the level of the diachronic analysis’, the framework of Balibar’s Elements for a Theory of Transition\n\n172","previous_page":171,"next_page":173}