{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","uuid":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","normalized_title":"marxandtheconceptofhistoricaltime","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":200,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Marx%20and%20the%20Concept%20of%20Historical%20Time","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/search"},"page":{"printed_page":175,"pdf_page":179,"physical_index":179,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"49cd7d07f6d1c42f2e341c59916eca7cb245f23d95a3cfc36e10d70770d16dbc"},"chapter":"第四章《资本论》:思考历史的条件","content":"在原始积累中表现为一个独特的历史过程的连续过程。129最后，他在《政治批判大纲》中指出，“一旦这种分离得到了，生产过程就只能重新生产它，再生产它，并且在扩大的规模上再生产它。”130这些段落触发了德·安吉利斯的陈述，即“积累与原始积累之间的区别，不是实质性的区别，而是实现这种分离的条件和形式的区别。”这一论点有其局限性一一与原始积累不同，资本主义积累的实体要复杂得多，它是由一系列关系和动力决定的，这些关系和动力不能归结为生产资料与生产者的分离一—然而，它是，这是构建原始积累和资本主义积累之间关系的一种挑衅方式。在一个(尽管是有限的)层面上，我们可能会断言，这两种积累之间的唯一区别是强制分离的社会条件和形式(例如，是枪还是握手)。\n\n原始积累和资本主义积累不能混为一谈，132但这不应该分散我们的注意力，因为它们是紧密交织在一起的，因此是不可分离的社会过程。博恩菲尔德的著作一致而有说服力地论证了这一点。133它强调原始积累是一种“永久”和“不断”再生产的积累，这种积累在不同程度上是“资本存在的条件和前提”，“……资本主义社会关系的基础，从而是劳动剥削赖以存在的社会结构”，以及“资本存在的前提和资本再生产的结果”。134博恩菲尔德认为，“简而言之，原始积累是资本主义社会关系的社会构成。135他的著作中有两个方面必须在这里强调，因为它们直接关系到原始积累和历史时间的生产之间的关系，我们将很快考虑到这一点。第一个是博恩菲尔德对黑格尔扬弃概念的使用，他使用这三者的方式\n\n129 Marx, Theorien über den Mehrwert, Dritter Teil, 309, 268 (Theories of Surplus-Value, Part 3, 315, 272).\n\n130 Marx, Grundrisse, 462.\n\n131 De Angelis, Marx and primitive accumulation: The continuous character of capital' s enclosures , 6.\n\n132 See footnote 126.\n\n133 With The Permanence of Primitive Accumulation: Commodity Fetishism and Social Constitutio’, see also Werner Bonefeld, History and Social Constitution: Primitive Accumulation is not Primitive' , The Commoner, Debate 1 (March 2002), http://www. commoner.org. uk/debbonefeld01.pdf (accessed 23 May 2015), Werner Bonefeld, Class Struggle and the Permanence of Primitive Accumulation\" , Common Sense 8 (November 1988), 54-66, and Werner Bonefeld, Critical Theory and the Critique of Political Economy: On Subversion and Negative Reason (London and New York: Bloomsbury Acādemic, 2014), specifically Chapter 4:Capital and Labour: Primitive Accumulation and the Force of Value'\n\n134 Bonefeld, The Permanence of Primitive Accumulation: Commodity Fetishism and Social Constitution' , 1-2.\n\n135 Ibid. 2.\n\n175","previous_page":174,"next_page":176}