{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","uuid":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","normalized_title":"marxandtheconceptofhistoricaltime","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":200,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Marx%20and%20the%20Concept%20of%20Historical%20Time","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/search"},"page":{"printed_page":176,"pdf_page":180,"physical_index":180,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"adbd1a491653d35504f42d765a2e88f2d017e3d6eb432ea666b033330121fa4a"},"chapter":"第四章《资本论》:思考历史的条件","content":"扬弃的意义记录了彼此矛盾的意义一一(1)提高/提升，(2)摧毁/废除，(3)保存/维持一一以便把握原始积累和资本主义积累之间的构成关系。与马克思在《政治批判纲要》中的陈述相呼应，“资本一旦在历史上发展起来，它自己就创造了它的存在条件(不是作为它产生的条件，而是作为它存在的结果)”136，博恩菲尔德坚持认为，“原始积累，即分离，它在资本主义积累的社会构成中是aufgehoben，并且现在不再被视为它的历史形成，而是作为积累的结果，这是资本为了再生产自己而不得不不断摆出的结果。137因此，第二个维度是，原始积累构成了作为资本主义内部占统治地位的社会形式的商品形式，因此也构成了商品的“恋物性”。正是在这种背景下，博恩菲尔德写道：\n\n原始积累是解决劳动力的特定资本主义存在方式的离心点，是人类有目的活动以劳动商品形式的决定。资本主义的生产关系和交换关系是通过商品形式而存在的，而原始积累则是以雇佣劳动商品形式来决定人类有目的的实践的秘密历史。商品形式通过这种规定而存在，以这种规定为前提，并通过它的形式，以抽象的平等和自由的名义否定这种规定。 138\n\n商品形式的“秘密”(das Geheimnis)与原始积累的“秘密”之间存在着不可分割的关系。原始积累是交换决定的社会关系的恋物性的历史本体论条件，这样，“……私人劳动之间的社会关系表现为它们的本来面目，也就是说，不是作为工作中的人之间的直接社会关系，而是作为人之间的类物关系和物之间的社会关系。”139也就是说，原始积累是这种条件(劳动力的商品化)的条件，没有这种条件，人与人之间的关系就不能表现为商品的关系\n\n136 Marx, Grundrisse, 459.\n\n137 Bonefeld, History and Social Constitution: Primitive Accumulation is not Primitive’, 6. Thus the notion that the essence of primitive accumulation is suspended [aufgehoben] in accumulation proper means that the principle of primitive accumulation, that is separation, is raised to a new level, rendering primitive accumulation as a specific epoch historically redundant. At the same time, its essential character is maintained as the constitutive presupposition of capital: separation.’ Ibid. 4. However, as we will consider shortly, the relationship between originary accumulation and the historical becoming' of the accumulation of capital cannot be restricted to the historical past (in its chronological register), because, as the constitutive basis of capital, originary accumulation is the ongoing constitutive basis of history as the ongoing self-expansion of time.\n\n138 Bonefeld, The Permanence of Primitive Accumulation: Commodity Fetishism and Social Constitution', 5.\n\n139Marx, Kapital 1, 87 (Capital 1, 166)\n\n176","previous_page":175,"next_page":177}