{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","uuid":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","normalized_title":"marxandtheconceptofhistoricaltime","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":200,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Marx%20and%20the%20Concept%20of%20Historical%20Time","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/search"},"page":{"printed_page":181,"pdf_page":185,"physical_index":185,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"371eaf3b01dc5cf65f108a4231680712806eedbcba8e02034875e207a6fb82b6"},"chapter":"第四章《资本论》:思考历史的条件","content":"经济力量[ökonomische Potenz]。153然而，就我们的目的而言，资本特有的去历史化的力量一一即资本所产生的历史化和去历史化的辩证法一一必须通过它与作为原始积累的系统暴力的本质本体论关系来理解。这让我们回到了马克思和本节对原始积累的分析开始的逻辑:再一次，看似无缝的，自我扩展的循环，资本积累以剩余价值为前提，剩余价值以资本主义生产为前提，资本主义生产以资本积累为前提。在马克思以后，我们打破了这个循环，暴露了这个循环赖以存在并(在这里背离了马克思)再生产的基础一一原始积累。现在必须考虑的是，首先，暴力在这个循环中的本质位置，从而，第二，暴力在历史时间生产中的本质位置。原始积累的暴力首先(并为此day154))使这样一个事实成为可能:资本的发展似乎劳动力总是可以被商品化的，也就是说，资本的发展不仅似乎劳动力是一种现成的商品，而且，好像它直接把劳动力当作自己的商品来生产(这就是它对人类生活资料的生产完全漠不关心)。这是因为原始积累的暴力不仅是资本循环性的前提，而且是它隐藏的、它秘密的，或者更好地说，是它被驱逐的前提:暴力是资本积累的前提，正是因为它作为资本的构成前提被资本直接抹掉了。正如贾森·里德(JasonRead)所表达的那样：“就像它在转型的点上一样，暴力的时刻几乎在它的执行中消失了……原始积累的暴力在它所构成的新秩序内部和通过新秩序立即得到了证明。”155.换句话说，原始积累的暴力立即被资本的生产过程所取消，这种取消\n\n153 Marx, Capital 1, 916.\n\n154 To this day’ , but, and once again, in no way predominantly overtly today. The violence of originary accumulation is indeed aufgehoben within capitalist accumulation, but this takes nothing away from the ongoing necessity of originary to capitalist accumulation.\n\n155 Read, Primitive Accumulation: the Aleatory Foundation of Capitalism’ , 37. Read formulates this in conjunction with the following passage in Deleuze and Guattari’ s A Thousand Plateaus: Hence the very particular character of State violence: it is very difficult to pinpoint this violence because it always presents itself as preaccomplished. It is not even adequate to say that the violence rests with the mode of production. Marx made the observation in the case of capitalism: there is a violençe that necessarily operaes through the State, precedes the capitalist mode of production, constitutes the “primitive accumulation\" , and makes possible the capitalist mode of production itself. From a standpoint within the capitalist mode of production, it is very difficult to say who is the thief and who is the victim, or even where the violence resides. That is because the worker is born entirely naked and the capitalist objectively “clothed\" , an independent owner. That which gave the worker and the capitalist this form eludes us because it operated in other modes of production. It is a violence that posits itself as preaccomplished, even though it is reactivated every day. See Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia [1980], trans. and foreword by Brian Massumi (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2003), 447.\n\n181","previous_page":180,"next_page":182}