{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","uuid":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","normalized_title":"marxandtheconceptofhistoricaltime","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":200,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Marx%20and%20the%20Concept%20of%20Historical%20Time","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/search"},"page":{"printed_page":182,"pdf_page":186,"physical_index":186,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"09c71527b390e3c892b3b926a54df884b906edb812c1ec1f137ae1340d9c0a9f"},"chapter":"第四章《资本论》:思考历史的条件","content":"商品形式的拜物教保证了商品形式的安全，并由它来保证商品形式的安全。正如里德所说，这导致了暴力本身的转变—一“一种新型暴力的出现”——这种转变不仅表明了这样一个事实，即“零星的和过度的封建形式的暴力变成了法律的普遍性”156(用马克思的话说，变成了“国家权力的普遍性”)，社会的集中的和有组织的暴力”157)，而且也转化为“作为规律的结果和原因的日常关系”158，也就是说，转化为资本生产过程的日常生活159\n\n因此，我们可以得出结论，认为历史和历史时间的现代哲学概念本质上是暴力的概念，因为原始积累被编织进了价值增值的结构中，从而编织进了历史时间的生产中。用马克思的话说，历史时间作为时间的自我膨胀，作为生产方式内部和生产方式之间发生变化的背景，其特征看似无关紧要，如果不是良性的，实际上是以一种系统的暴力为前提的一一这是资本主义所特有的—一这种暴力不仅“在它所构成的新秩序内部并被它所构成的新秩序立即证明是正当的”，而且还被这个秩序积极地重新创造出来。正在进行的新需求的创造的时间可理解性—一正在进行的第一个历史行为的时间可理解性一—实际上是基于一种特殊的暴力的时间性，这种暴力不仅“总是表现为预先完成的”160，但恰恰是因为它被一种生产方式所再生产，这种生产方式把自己表现为预先完成的，把自己表现为自身存在的自给自足的条件。\n\n156 Read, Primitive Accumulation: the Aleatory Foundation of Capitalism', 38.\n\n157 Marx, Kapital 1, 779 (Capital 1, 915).\n\n158 Read, Primitive Accumulation: the Aleatory Foundation of Capitalism’, 38.\n\n159 Therefore, capitalist accumulation is nothing other than primitive accumulation continued onto the shop floor, thus nothing other than a continuation of the modification of violence begun with “bloody legislation\" and the enclosure acts.’ Ibid.\n\n160 Deleuze and Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, 447.\n\n182","previous_page":181,"next_page":183}