{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","uuid":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","normalized_title":"marxandtheconceptofhistoricaltime","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":200,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Marx%20and%20the%20Concept%20of%20Historical%20Time","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/search"},"page":{"printed_page":3,"pdf_page":7,"physical_index":7,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"9aeed23e9d7017b44777155dc25639e4544dffdd4311e7e4fa1dc6a73d426655"},"chapter":"马克思与历史时间概念","content":"因此，这篇论文——尤其是第一章——无疑是一部重构之作。它阐述了马克思著作中某些范畴的意义，而马克思自己未必这么做。这里最值得注意的例子是将“经济”表述为“生活资料的社会生产”。换句话说，人类对其生存资料的社会生产贯穿了“费尔巴哈章”，但马克思和恩格斯没有在任何地方——至少没有明确地——说明这种社会生产构成了“经济”的意义。然而，这篇论文的论点是，“经济”必须被视为“生活资料的社会生产”因为这样做可以打开马克思著作中包含的丰富的社会和历史洞察力。它使我们能够将“经济”本身作为一个丰富的哲学概念，作为一个指定“人”本身意义的本体论概念来研究。正如我们将看到的那样，这是基础一一引用构成本引言的引文—一“经济”和“经济”可以被理解为不可磨灭的时间范畴，其方式超越了马克思对它们的时间意义的理解，但不一定是紧张的。这也是《德意志意识形态》中某些段落优先于其他段落的基础。这里特别值得注意的是马克思和恩格斯对他们所谓的“第一个历史活动”的描述(首先应当指出，这是一个必然进行的“第一个历史活动”)。的确，不仅第一章的可理解性，而且整个论文的可理解性取决于赋予第一个历史行为及其时间性以哲学意义，这种哲学意义无疑超过了马克思和恩格斯的意义\n\n8 Gary K. Browning, The German Ideology: the Theory of History and the History of Theory' ,History of Political Thought 14:3 (Autumn 1993), 456, According to Browning, The German Ideology should be analysed and interpreted as an integral whole’ , such that its various sections are intimately related to one another and share a community of purpose and character.' Ibid. 455.\n\n3","previous_page":2,"next_page":4}