{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","id":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","uuid":"b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","normalized_title":"marxandtheconceptofhistoricaltime","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":200,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Marx%20and%20the%20Concept%20of%20Historical%20Time","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/b1ad407a-d523-4f8b-bd50-238767f146d6/search"},"page":{"printed_page":33,"pdf_page":37,"physical_index":37,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"d974263f06fb783a9a8a04ce33725fe29eef0626c6d5b2d497599433d1f68463"},"chapter":"第一章唯物主义历史观:一种时间解读","content":"现在对过去的超越。更妙的是:现在对过去的辩证超越就是过去的未来(现在是过去的未来)。这两种观察加在一起，形成了第一个历史行为的双重时间性。61\n\n现在的问题是:唯物主义历史观的其他决定性方面是否重新构建、修改和扩展了第一个历史行为的时间性?这些方面是否为唯物主义历史观的这种时间性解读增添了新的维度?马克思的需要概念无疑是他的超历史的财富概念的基石，因此《德意志意识形态》中需要的辩证化为财富提供了压倒一切的历史尺度结构。继黑格尔之后，马克思的辩证法就是历史化:经济是历史哲学的一个范畴，因为生活资料的社会生产在内部和辩证地区分为满足现有需要的手段的创造和新需要的创造。辩证法也就是时间化:如果“时间”是过去、现在和未来的抽象统一的名称，那么时间化就是这些坐标之间动态关系的积极生产，因为实践和劳动从一开始就是马克思的辩证概念。然而，需求本身并没有穷尽经济的哲学范围。生活手段的创造当然是生活手段的社会创造，因此，支配这种创造的各种关系也支配着“手段”和“生活”在时间和历史上的可理解性。此外，尽管生活资料现在已经被研究了与需要的关系，但扩展这些手段的哲学特征是至关重要的，这样它们和它们所满足的需要就可以被理解为生产力[Produktivkräfte]。如果在某种程度上，马克思认为“历史”是经济主体对自身的辩证对应(Entsprechung)，换句话说，如果历史是不断创造的新需求和与这种创造相适应的生产力的扩张，那么就必须这样做。简单地说，我们已经达到了生产力与“形式”、“手段”和“交往关系”(Verkehrsform, Verkehrsmittel, Verkehrsverhältnisse，分别)之间的本质矛盾它们更普遍地预示了“生产关系”[Produktionsverhältnisse]在马克思历史哲学中的地位。62\n\n61Biological reproduction can be made to fit within the framework of this twofold temporality. As regards the relationship between biological, social and historical time in Marx, it is worthwhile perhaps to rework the famous passage from the Introduction to the B’ (or 1787) edition of the Critique of Pure Reason, and to suggest thatalthough all social aņd historical time commences with biological time, it does not on that account all arise from biological time' (cf.although all our cognition commences with experience, it does not on that account all arise from experience' Kant, CPR, B 1-2, 136.) This move fundamentally inverts Kant: it imposes the a posteriori -or social and historical time in Marx -on Kant' s a priori, whilst holding on to the necessary and universal character exclusive to this a priori. The same manoeuvre is made in the next chapter, in relation to Heidegger' s practical philosophy.\n\n33","previous_page":32,"next_page":34}