{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"b708aa90-cb9d-4126-93b7-4c56ecb08efe","title":"象征的贫困 2：感性的灾难","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787305250415","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"b708aa90-cb9d-4126-93b7-4c56ecb08efe","id":"b708aa90-cb9d-4126-93b7-4c56ecb08efe","uuid":"b708aa90-cb9d-4126-93b7-4c56ecb08efe","title":"象征的贫困 2：感性的灾难","normalized_title":"象征的贫困2感性的灾难","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787305250415","isbns":["9787305250415"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":288,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/b708aa90-cb9d-4126-93b7-4c56ecb08efe","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%B1%A1%E5%BE%81%E7%9A%84%E8%B4%AB%E5%9B%B0%202%EF%BC%9A%E6%84%9F%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%81%BE%E9%9A%BE","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/b708aa90-cb9d-4126-93b7-4c56ecb08efe/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/b708aa90-cb9d-4126-93b7-4c56ecb08efe/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/b708aa90-cb9d-4126-93b7-4c56ecb08efe","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/b708aa90-cb9d-4126-93b7-4c56ecb08efe/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/b708aa90-cb9d-4126-93b7-4c56ecb08efe/search"},"page":{"printed_page":106,"pdf_page":121,"physical_index":121,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"36207284e53bfe7b8b766d31f7b6d2cd7604a751f18191a821f7529953261a98"},"chapter":"第二章 装备仪器","content":"然而，博伊斯对这两个泰坦神形象的可能的理解，却颇为矛盾。他把爱比米修斯理解为田园形象，我深深觉得很不准确。①普罗米修斯与爱比米修斯之间的区别，不是牧羊人与手艺人的区别，是一个能提前知道并且能够记忆一切，而另一个则遗忘并且从不预测第二天，他只知道从错误中学习—这些错误完全都是从技术-逻辑条件中获取的，而技术-逻辑条件是一种既定的品质缺陷，一种原始的缺陷。它（错误）的连续是一种经验的连续，作为这些经验印迹沉积下来并且得到转播，构成了充当感性的器官学谱系的文化。\n\n不过，这里的问题不是给博伊斯赋予或好或坏的观点，更不是起诉他什么，或抬高他什么。尽管我们的时代对采取“轰动”的立场这类事倍感兴趣。轰动这个词用在此处有另一个意思，我将再次讨论。它意味着能意轰动的倒退，通过这种倒退，总是可以将某个象征推向其反面，完全可以将一档节目的象征效率变成一种对征的效率。\n\n真正的赌注，就是要说出博伊斯在什么方面构成了一个关键时刻，这个时刻既是对沃霍尔的回应，也是一种反论，还有对杜尚（Duchamp）的回应。为什么这个舞台的演员们会审视个体化的档案，将个体化当作参与和参与的丧失，这些问题对博伊斯而言，构成了一场斗争的对象。\n\n①“……爱比米修斯文化，监管牧羊人和自然的看守人的文化……”，同上，第135页。\n\n106\n\n象征的贫困2：感性的灾难","previous_page":105,"next_page":107}