{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"b708aa90-cb9d-4126-93b7-4c56ecb08efe","title":"象征的贫困 2：感性的灾难","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787305250415","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"b708aa90-cb9d-4126-93b7-4c56ecb08efe","id":"b708aa90-cb9d-4126-93b7-4c56ecb08efe","uuid":"b708aa90-cb9d-4126-93b7-4c56ecb08efe","title":"象征的贫困 2：感性的灾难","normalized_title":"象征的贫困2感性的灾难","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787305250415","isbns":["9787305250415"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":288,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/b708aa90-cb9d-4126-93b7-4c56ecb08efe","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%B1%A1%E5%BE%81%E7%9A%84%E8%B4%AB%E5%9B%B0%202%EF%BC%9A%E6%84%9F%E6%80%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%81%BE%E9%9A%BE","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/b708aa90-cb9d-4126-93b7-4c56ecb08efe/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/b708aa90-cb9d-4126-93b7-4c56ecb08efe/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/b708aa90-cb9d-4126-93b7-4c56ecb08efe","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/b708aa90-cb9d-4126-93b7-4c56ecb08efe/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/b708aa90-cb9d-4126-93b7-4c56ecb08efe/search"},"page":{"printed_page":178,"pdf_page":193,"physical_index":193,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"db35a48eb1677aeac2a5bc9fb7693d3d24a379ed0bc3bf0035355ef36bd2200d"},"chapter":"第四章 弗洛伊德的压抑","content":"我们大家的意思是说即时的我们。但是这个即时成为大家的我们，不会是即时进入行动中的大家，因为：\n\n……从即时角度看，这里不会有即时的扣押（荷尔德林在名为《最高处》①的片段中以强有力的方式说过这一点）。\n\n即时（l'immediat）就是袭取（sur-prend）能意灵魂及其行动的东西。但是这种袭取并不立即突然发生。对第三持存（其器官学是一个系统）的分析，是对这个即时进行共取-袭取（compréhension-surpréhension）的条件，当作一种去扣押（désaisissement），也就是说一种延异（différance），即相位差的循环和时间。这并不是说第三持存是个中继，而且只有从这个中继出发，即时才变得可以企及，成为一种幻觉性事后经验（après-couphallucinatoire）——因为这个中继，它与即时的即时性一样被人拒绝：\n\n即时将排除任何的即时……同时它也排除自身放弃它的即时性为了能够提供通路，它每次都得服从某个中间人②的中继。\n\n② 同上。\n\n① 参见莫里斯·布朗肖，《无尽的谈话》，伽利玛出版社，1969年，第53页。\n\n178\n\n象征的贫困2：感性的灾难","previous_page":177,"next_page":179}