{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e","title":"交往与社会进化","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e","id":"ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e","uuid":"ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e","title":"交往与社会进化","normalized_title":"交往与社会进化","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":284,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BA%A4%E5%BE%80%E4%B8%8E%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E8%BF%9B%E5%8C%96","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e/search"},"page":{"printed_page":216,"pdf_page":245,"physical_index":245,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"9abff8996ac0f9cd4750bc1dbefb67cfd2462d882871f13bb100c4d08422ac9f"},"chapter":"第五章现代国家中的合法化问题","content":"18.“历史与进化”[“Geschichte und Evolution”]，载《历史唯物主义 的重建》[Zur Rekonstruktion des Historischen Materialismus)(Frankfurt,1976),PP200\\~259,这里引自P250。\n\n19.《合法化危机》[Legitimation Crisis)(Boston,1975)。\n\n“什么是普遍语用学”注释\n\n1.迄今为止，“语用学”这个术语一直被用于分析语言运用的特殊关联域，而不是用于对语言运用（或在话语中运用语句）之普遍特性的重建。我虽引入了“普遍的”语用学以便区别于“经验的”语用学，但已不再满意于这个术语，“规范语用学”—作为“规范语义学”的延伸—-可能更合适一些。“规范语用学”(“Formalpragmatik”)乃是F·舒兹(Schütze)在<社会学发生角度的语言》[Sprache Soziologisch Gesehen(第2卷,Munich,1975)中提出的一个术语，参见该书摘要PP911\\~1024。\n\n2.我想集中讨论这样一类理想化了的交往行为类型，即“交感性相互作用”。在其中，参与者同享某种传统，他们的倾向性亦被规范式地统一到这样一种程度，即他们都从同一种情境界定出发，而且不存在对他们相互满足的有效性要求不予认同的现象。下列图表给出了交感性相互作用在一个拥有不同社会行为类型的系统中的极端情形。以这个分类为基础，剩下的问题则是参与者将提出哪些范畴的有效性要求并对之作出响应。\n\n这些行为类型可以根据它们与言语的有效性基础的关系被区分如下：\n\n216\n\n国外马克思主义和社会主义研究丛书","previous_page":215,"next_page":217}