{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e","title":"交往与社会进化","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e","id":"ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e","uuid":"ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e","title":"交往与社会进化","normalized_title":"交往与社会进化","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":284,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BA%A4%E5%BE%80%E4%B8%8E%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E8%BF%9B%E5%8C%96","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e/search"},"page":{"printed_page":218,"pdf_page":247,"physical_index":247,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"546e3c3afa3c4489a67fac531e38fe30575bbed068e7f49de7c45b97320dc603"},"chapter":"第五章现代国家中的合法化问题","content":"5.Y·巴-希莱尔在他对我的批评(见“关于哈贝马斯的释义学语言哲学”[“()n Habermas's Hermeneutic Philosophy of Language\"], 载《综合>杂志[Synthese]<1973>：PP1\\~12)中没有能看到这一点。他的批评是建立在篇我已表明其临时性的文章基础上的(指我的“对一种交往资质理论的初步说明”-文“Vorbereitende Bemerkungen zu einer Theorie derKommunikativenKompetenz”]，载J·哈贝马斯和N·卢曼《社会理论还是社会技术论》(Frankfurt1971),PP101\\~141)。我感到，Y·巴-希莱尔对我产生误解的地方是如此之多，以至于在细节方面作出答复将毫无意义。我只能希望在目前这篇概略文章中，使我的观点（它仍然带有强烈的方案性质)甚至对这样一类读者——他们带有敌意的倾向，且不乏释义学的、而非特殊的直率——显得更清晰些。\n\n6.例如，可以参见K-O阿佩尔的《哲学的转化·卷2»〔Transformationder Philosophie Vol、2〕(Frankfurt,1971)，P406,或“—种超验语用学观念的纲要性述评”[“Programmatische Bemerkungen zur Idee einerTranszendentalen Sprachpragmatik”)，载B·奥萨·托姆丛书126(Tuk-u, 1973),PP11\\~35。\n\n9.Y·巴-希莱尔“索引性表达”[“IndexicalExpressions”]，载《语言诸方面»[Aspects of Language](Jerusalem,1970),PP69\\~88,以及“语义学和交往[“Semantics and Communication”]，载H·海德利希《语义学和交往[Semantics and Communication)(Amsterdam,1974),PP1\\~36。把Y·巴-希莱尔的观点当作出发点，A·凯舍尔也提出一种把语言表达置于超语言情境中的规范性理论，见“走向语言施行理论的一步”“AstepForwardto a Theory of Linguistic Performance”],载Y·巴-希莱尔主编的《自然语言的语用学»[Pragmatics of Natural Languages)(Dordrecht,1971),PP84\\~93；还可参见R·C·斯泰尔纳克“语用学”[“Pragmatics”]，载达维森和哈尔曼合编的《自然语言的语义学[Semantics of Natural Languages](Dordrecht,1972),PP380\\~387。\n\n218\n\n国外马克思主义和社会主义研究丛书","previous_page":217,"next_page":219}