{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e","title":"交往与社会进化","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e","id":"ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e","uuid":"ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e","title":"交往与社会进化","normalized_title":"交往与社会进化","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":284,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BA%A4%E5%BE%80%E4%B8%8E%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E8%BF%9B%E5%8C%96","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e/search"},"page":{"printed_page":225,"pdf_page":254,"physical_index":254,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"ab5e05dede79a11ad7534b7dfb6f9eefc2c9c9d2fe06ae4ad35e23f5542957af"},"chapter":"第五章现代国家中的合法化问题","content":"PP221\\~239，重载于罗森伯格和特雷弗斯主编的《语言哲学研究》Readingsin the Philosophy of Language](Englwood Cliffs,N• J• 1971), PP614\\~628;“奥斯丁论以言表意行为和以言行事行为”〔“Austin on Locut-ionary and Illocutionary Acts\"],载<哲学评论»77(1968),PP405\\~424,重载于<语言哲学研究》,PP262\\~275;<言语行为》[SpeechActs〕](London,1969);“语言学与言语哲学”[“Linguistik und Sprachphilosophie”],载巴什和威诺曼主编的《语言学与相邻科学》，PP111\\~126。\n\n其它资料包括：W·P·阿尔斯顿《语言哲学》[Philosophy of Langua-ge〕和“语言行为”[“Linguistic Acts”]，载《美国哲学季刊》〔AmericanPhilosophical Quarterly〕1(1964),PP138\\~146;L·J·柯亨“是否存在以言行事力量?”[“Do Illocutionary Forces Exist?\"],载《哲学季刊»[Phi-1osophical Quarterly]14(1964)，PP118\\~137，重载于罗森伯格和特雷弗斯主编的《语言哲学研究》，PP580\\~598,“言语行为”[“Speech Acts”],载《语言学的当前趋向[Current Trends in Linguistics)12(1970);R·M·哈里“意义与言语行为”[“Meaning and Speech Acts”],载《哲学评论>79(1970),PP3\\~24，“奥斯丁关于以言表意行为与以言行事行为的区分”“Austin'sDistinction Between Locutionary and Illocutionary Acts\"),载哈里<实践推理》[Practical Inference)(London,1972);D·霍德克劳弗特“施行性和陈述”[“Performatives and Statements”〕，载<精神》杂志〔Mind]83(1974),PP1\\~18;P·F·斯特沃森“言语行为中的意向和惯性”〔“Intentionand Convention in Speech Acts\"),载«哲学评论»73(1964),PP439\\~460,重载于罗森伯格和特雷弗斯主编的《语言哲学研究》，PP599\\~613;S·色沃“埃贝蒂克与以言行事行为间的区别”[“The Distinction Between Ebetic andIllocutionary Acts”),载<分析>杂志[Analysis〕32(1972'73)，PP177\\~183;C·特雷弗斯“一种衍生的言语行为理论”〔A Generative Theory ofSpeech Acts”〕，载罗森伯格和特雷弗斯主编的《语言哲学研究>，PP629\\~644;G·J·瓦尔诺克“哈里论意义和言语行为”[“Hare on Meaning andSpeech Acts”],载<哲学评论>80(1971),PP80\\~84；冯特利希<语言学的基础>,PP309\\~352。\n\n59.乔姆斯基《句法理论概观》，PP3ff。\n\n60.这些限制条件请参看后面关于塞尔的可表达性原则的讨论。\n\n61.P·F·斯特沃森<论个体Individuals](London，1959)；M·杜姆特《弗莱格与语言哲学Frege,Philosophy of Language〕(London,1973);E·图根哈特语言分析哲学导论讲座》[Vorlesungen Zur Einfit.\n\n注\n\n释\n\n225","previous_page":224,"next_page":226}