{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e","title":"交往与社会进化","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e","id":"ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e","uuid":"ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e","title":"交往与社会进化","normalized_title":"交往与社会进化","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":284,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BA%A4%E5%BE%80%E4%B8%8E%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E8%BF%9B%E5%8C%96","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ba5508dd-cbe1-4126-aea9-a8f0fad2633e/search"},"page":{"printed_page":230,"pdf_page":259,"physical_index":259,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"b133c9c8ded7157ddfd47058cc3beeb412d6f48815b89d7abe21cff6b8a24201"},"chapter":"第五章现代国家中的合法化问题","content":"惯常方式使S理解这一点。\n\n93.D·霍尔德克劳弗特忽略了这种差别（见“施行和陈述”〔“Perform-atives and Statement”]《精神»杂志83(1974),PP1\\~18),并因此得出错误的结论，即只有那些我们称之为团体化约束的言语行为才在语句意义上受到习惯的调整：“一个语句类型是施行性的，如果、而且仅仅如果它的文字以及一系列话语能够组成一个行为的施行，这种行为施行是根据习惯作出的，而该习惯并非仅仅是语法性或语义性的习惯。”\n\n94.在冯特利希对规劝的分析中，他的条件B4一6构成了义务的内容。\n\n95.H·达尔修斯“自我逻辑陈述的真实性特征”[“Zum Wahrheitscharakter egologischer Aussagen”]，载布罗克曼和豪弗主编的《费解的实在 性》 [Die Wirklichkeit des Unverständlichen)](The Hague,1974), PP 38\\~77。\n\n“道德发展与自我同一性”注释\n\n1.R·道勃特和G·诺纳尔-辛克莱“晚近资本主义社会中冲突与倒退的 潜势”“Konflikt-und Rückzugspotentiale in Spätkapitalistischen Gesellschaften”],载《社会学杂志[Zeitschrift für Soziologie](1973), PP301\\~325；R·道勃特和G·诺纳尔-辛克莱《青春期危机和同一性的形成 [Adoleszenzkrise und Identitätabildung](Frankfurt,1975)。\n\n2.J·哈贝马斯“释义学的普遍要求”“Der Universalitätsanspruchder Hermeneutik”]载《文化与批判》 [Kultur und Kritik](Frankfurt,1973),PP264\\~301。这篇文章的一部分已被译成英文，标题是“论系统扭曲了的交往”“On Systematically Distorted Communication”〕载《探究》杂志，13(1970),PP205\\~218。\n\n3.H·马尔库兹“精神分析理论的过时”[“Das Veralten der Psych-oanalyse\"]，载文化与社会[Kultur und Gesellschaft]2 (Frankurt,1965),PP96\\~97，英译为“弗洛伊德人的概念的废弃”〔“The obso1escenceof the Freudian Concept of Man\"],载«五次讲演》 [Five Lectures](Boston,1970),PP44\\~61。\n\n4.T·W·阿道尔诺“社会学与心理学的相互关系”〔“ZumVerhaltnisvon Soziologie und Psychologie”],载«社会学»[Sociologica)(Fran-kfurt.1955),P43,英译为“社会学与心理学”[“Sociology and Psycholog-y”)，载《新左派评论》[New Left Review]，46(1967), PP67\\~80和47\n\n230\n\n国外马克思主义和社会主义研究丛书","previous_page":229,"next_page":231}