{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"c10e658d-57f8-405b-9a17-dc45c392389c","title":"数字劳动与卡尔·马克思","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"2405518376","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"c10e658d-57f8-405b-9a17-dc45c392389c","id":"c10e658d-57f8-405b-9a17-dc45c392389c","uuid":"c10e658d-57f8-405b-9a17-dc45c392389c","title":"数字劳动与卡尔·马克思","normalized_title":"数字劳动与卡尔马克思","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"2405518376","isbns":["2405518376","9787010230115","9780415716161"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":592,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/c10e658d-57f8-405b-9a17-dc45c392389c","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E5%8A%B3%E5%8A%A8%E4%B8%8E%E5%8D%A1%E5%B0%94%C2%B7%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/c10e658d-57f8-405b-9a17-dc45c392389c/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/c10e658d-57f8-405b-9a17-dc45c392389c/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/c10e658d-57f8-405b-9a17-dc45c392389c","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/c10e658d-57f8-405b-9a17-dc45c392389c/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/c10e658d-57f8-405b-9a17-dc45c392389c/search"},"page":{"printed_page":57,"pdf_page":78,"physical_index":78,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"b7f91353fff1257fedd6dd08fb75d6dfc2ad91a7456fb9da71d727d05c16273b"},"chapter":"第二章 卡尔·马克思的理论介绍","content":"齐泽克(SlavojŽižek)也传播了一个与海因里希相似的价值概念。他认为，抽象劳动“是一种价值关系，只在交换中构成自身的价值关系，它不是一个商品独立于其他商品关系的实质性属性”(Žižek，2010b，213)价值在本质上是不存在的，仅仅是“交换的外在表现”(同上，214)。\n\n海因里希（1999）认为，这种交换——和货币——价值概念恰当地把价值概念化为一种社会关系。“私有劳动只有在交换的过程中才能把自身转换为社会劳动，交换成为创造价值的劳动。但是，私有劳动如上所提及也如下，只有在交换中商品才获得价值和价值的大小”(同上，232，译自德语)。⑧在《资本论》第1卷德语首版中，货币不是价值形式分析的组成部分；而在《资本论》第1卷德语第二版中，马克思介绍了货币形式，并将其作为价值形式分析的组成部分。海因里希(1999，228)同意格哈德·格勒(GerhardGöhler,1980)的观点，认为这导致了“减少的辩证法”。巴克豪斯和赖歇尔特(Reichelt,1995)写了一篇关于海因里希《价值科学》一书的讨论，他们认为，海因里希假设了价值和价格的逻辑差异性与分期特征(Backhaus and Reichelt，1995，68)，并重申了他们的观点—广泛地阅读《资本论》第1卷包含了一个对价值形式分析的推广和简化。\n\n海因里希、雷查特、巴克豪斯及追随者强调的《资本论》首版中，马克思(1867b，15—44)最初的价值形式分析有四种，具体如下：\n\n第二章卡尔·马克思的理论介绍\n\n57","previous_page":56,"next_page":58}