{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"c27a70cd-8360-4b30-b39d-33b39eac0b68","title":"剩余价值学说史 《资本论》第4卷 1","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564038502","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"c27a70cd-8360-4b30-b39d-33b39eac0b68","id":"c27a70cd-8360-4b30-b39d-33b39eac0b68","uuid":"c27a70cd-8360-4b30-b39d-33b39eac0b68","title":"剩余价值学说史 《资本论》第4卷 1","normalized_title":"剩余价值学说史资本论第4卷1","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787564038502","isbns":["9787564038502"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":341,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/c27a70cd-8360-4b30-b39d-33b39eac0b68","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%89%A9%E4%BD%99%E4%BB%B7%E5%80%BC%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%B4%E5%8F%B2%20%E3%80%8A%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E8%AE%BA%E3%80%8B%E7%AC%AC4%E5%8D%B7%201","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/c27a70cd-8360-4b30-b39d-33b39eac0b68/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/c27a70cd-8360-4b30-b39d-33b39eac0b68/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/c27a70cd-8360-4b30-b39d-33b39eac0b68","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/c27a70cd-8360-4b30-b39d-33b39eac0b68/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/c27a70cd-8360-4b30-b39d-33b39eac0b68/search"},"page":{"printed_page":245,"pdf_page":262,"physical_index":262,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"b6ebad18b2c43556f4fbdc2a2ff53ca758c50241af6d01e57d20f7f0ccb9720e"},"chapter":"剩余价值学说史","content":"这位市民，一方面承认财富依存于生产超过消费的事实，另一方面又承认只有消费会给予价值。并且，一个消费1，000法郎的仆人，和一个只消费500法郎的农民比较，会在价值的给予上，发生加倍的贡献。\n\n甘尼尔承认，不生产劳动者不直接参加物质财富的形成。斯密也不外就是这样主张。从另一方面说，他又费神要一反自已的告白，证明它同样会创造物质的财富。在一切这类反驳斯密的议论中，我们一方面发觉对于物质生产的赞扬，别方面我们又发觉这种愿望：要把非物质的生产———甚至非生产，例如侍仆当做物质的生产，来辩解。纯所得的所有者，究竟是把这种所得消费在侍仆身上，消费在妾妇身上，还是消费在肉馒头上，那是全然没有关系的。但可笑的是这种幻想：如果不要使生产物的价值归于消灭，有余的东西是必须由侍仆消费，不能由生产劳动者自己去消费。马尔萨斯也承认不生产的消费者是必要的。在有余的东西是属于有闲阶级（gensoisifs）手里时，这种必要性实际也是存在的。\n\n第二篇 亚当斯密和生产劳动的概念\n\n245\n\n①这个市民在以后一页又说：“每一种劳动，会比例于它的交换价值，生产财富，它的交换价值，是由供给和需要决定的。（它生产多少财富，不是比例于它生产了多少交换价值，而是比例于它是多少交换价值，那就是，不比例于它所生产的东西，而是比例于它所费的东西)。所以它的价值对于资本的蓄积所以有贡献，只因为它节约了它有权在总生产物中享受的部分，没有把它消费掉。","previous_page":244,"next_page":246}