{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","title":"技术与时间：2.迷失方向：人文与社会译丛","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544711999","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","id":"c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","uuid":"c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","title":"技术与时间：2.迷失方向：人文与社会译丛","normalized_title":"技术与时间2迷失方向人文与社会译丛","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544711999","isbns":["9787544711999"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":306,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%B8%8E%E6%97%B6%E9%97%B4%EF%BC%9A2.%E8%BF%B7%E5%A4%B1%E6%96%B9%E5%90%91%EF%BC%9A%E4%BA%BA%E6%96%87%E4%B8%8E%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E8%AF%91%E4%B8%9B","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88/search"},"page":{"printed_page":133,"pdf_page":142,"physical_index":142,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"964d68b78bffe7e216a2a20818ced65e8469de7956f7a99827bd54aac7cfbe8b"},"chapter":"第三章记忆的工业化","content":"如果不可能把叙述、事件、对事件的叙述和叙述的事件，或者说把事件、输入、对输入的接收真正区分开来，而只是从形式上(即理论上)区分；如果事件终归是事件的输入，且这个输入终归是其接收，同时文章在历史中—即在时间的精确记录中——离开了阅读、离开了文章之外或之前的内容就不成其为文章，那么上述情形就只能出现于延迟即事后效应中——滞留一前摄作用于事后的断层中。滞留与前摄既分化又延迟，这种分化与延迟在把握区域性可能性的同时，也在把握(有别于事实的)理论的可能性。\n\n滞留有限性需要一种像能够确立差异、等级和先后顺序的标准那样的规则。这种规则也适用于记忆和领土:只有走过的领土才算领土，只有重新回忆的记忆才算记忆;在领土中需要定向，在记忆的已经在此中同样需要定向。地图虽然对应着领土，是领土的完全对等的复制物，却不能与领土“点对点”地完全吻合，“这种范围过大的地图(或许)没有多大用处”①,因为它没有给定向带来更多的方便。同样，记忆要想成为值得记忆之事，就必须减少可记忆之事;欲在记忆的已经在此中定向，就必须遗忘(已经在此)。不会遗忘的记忆就像费奈斯①的记忆那样不能走出当下，不能让当下通过，不能记住当下，甚至不能通达当下，因为它是非记忆,也是非思维。费奈斯\n\n第三章记忆的工业化\n\n①J.L.博尔赫斯：“严谨科学博物馆”,《作者及其他作品》，第198页,Gallimard，1965年版。\n\n133","previous_page":132,"next_page":134}