{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","title":"技术与时间：2.迷失方向：人文与社会译丛","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544711999","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","id":"c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","uuid":"c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","title":"技术与时间：2.迷失方向：人文与社会译丛","normalized_title":"技术与时间2迷失方向人文与社会译丛","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544711999","isbns":["9787544711999"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":306,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%B8%8E%E6%97%B6%E9%97%B4%EF%BC%9A2.%E8%BF%B7%E5%A4%B1%E6%96%B9%E5%90%91%EF%BC%9A%E4%BA%BA%E6%96%87%E4%B8%8E%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E8%AF%91%E4%B8%9B","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88/search"},"page":{"printed_page":153,"pdf_page":162,"physical_index":162,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"38d8436164c28af671301976eded21937a11a386d80870acadccde70d3fd945d"},"chapter":"第三章记忆的工业化","content":"12.信息与知识\n\n存档的“盈利性”是不可计算的,因为已经在此隐藏在存档中，也就是说作为将要发生但尚未发生之事，它已包含了不确定性。知识不是信息，因为从根本上讲，所有知识首先是知识的不确实性的知识，也是“谁”的不确定性的知识。应当记录的是不确实性和不确定性，应当实现的是相关差异。\n\n胡塞尔指的再激活就是康德所说的对—与“历史”知识相对立的——理性知识的再激活。理性知识是唯一可能的知识，它不能简单地被接受。\n\n同理，专门学习某一哲学体系，比如学习沃尔夫体系的人，尽管所有原则、定义、证明以及整个体系的微妙之处尽在他脑中，尽管从某种程度上讲，他可以对此体系的各个部分了如指掌，但他还是只具备有关沃尔夫哲学的全部历史知识，只了解他学过的内容，只能根据这些内容作出判断。[…]他以一种奇特的理性学到了这个体系，但模仿能力并非发明能力，也就是说，在他身上知识并不是从理性中来。尽管这个知识也许客观上是理性知识，但主观上它仍然仅仅是历史知识。①\n\n所有阅读的目的在于写作，这也意味着作为真正知识的理性知识应当由懂得它的人重新构建。但知识的(重新)构建之所以可能,是因为存在着一种原初的知识,即古希腊文的“求知(mathématique)”。\n\n第三章记忆的工业化\n\n① 康德：《纯粹理性批判》,第560页,PUF,1944年版。\n\n153","previous_page":152,"next_page":154}