{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","title":"技术与时间：2.迷失方向：人文与社会译丛","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544711999","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","id":"c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","uuid":"c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","title":"技术与时间：2.迷失方向：人文与社会译丛","normalized_title":"技术与时间2迷失方向人文与社会译丛","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544711999","isbns":["9787544711999"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":306,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%B8%8E%E6%97%B6%E9%97%B4%EF%BC%9A2.%E8%BF%B7%E5%A4%B1%E6%96%B9%E5%90%91%EF%BC%9A%E4%BA%BA%E6%96%87%E4%B8%8E%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E8%AF%91%E4%B8%9B","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88/search"},"page":{"printed_page":199,"pdf_page":208,"physical_index":208,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"94db4fe973f0a16a82fbb5edd38a0dfe07972b705f4b98a4a2dff82ddec7b207"},"chapter":"第三章记忆的工业化","content":"这种混淆抹杀了作为终极结构的走向死亡的存在的本质意义，所以工具衰退所构成的器具性中的意义性中断被曲解了：\n\n理性主义从传统上重视分析性理解以及与世界—包括与工具—互动过程中的推理所扮演的角色。海德格尔和马图拉纳都独具匠心地指出了“手下”之物(结构性偶合)的重要性，也指出了在达不到这一偶合时，物体及其属性得以存在的途径。[…]\n\n海德格尔认为，当“事物”的不在场把“事物”显示为“忧虑”的对象时，它们似乎不能被支配。①\n\n我们在此期望的是原初时间性问题被提出来。正相反，中断只通达对作为手下之物的现成在手的存在者的理解。海德格尔\n\n把再现看作只发生在我们投入活动中断之时的派生现象②。\n\n于是数字技术被纳入很大程度上与计划混为一谈的用具作用性范畴，与此同时，“原初”时间性即有限性的问题消失了。令人费解的是“什么”的创造性，即构成“谁”的已经在此的不可支配性。“什么”的创造性体现在语言中，但又仅限于语言：\n\n第三章 记忆的工业化\n\n①《有疑问的人工智能》,第122—123页。\n\n199\n\n② 同上，第124页。","previous_page":198,"next_page":200}