{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","title":"技术与时间：2.迷失方向：人文与社会译丛","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544711999","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","id":"c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","uuid":"c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","title":"技术与时间：2.迷失方向：人文与社会译丛","normalized_title":"技术与时间2迷失方向人文与社会译丛","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544711999","isbns":["9787544711999"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":306,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%B8%8E%E6%97%B6%E9%97%B4%EF%BC%9A2.%E8%BF%B7%E5%A4%B1%E6%96%B9%E5%90%91%EF%BC%9A%E4%BA%BA%E6%96%87%E4%B8%8E%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E8%AF%91%E4%B8%9B","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88/search"},"page":{"printed_page":239,"pdf_page":248,"physical_index":248,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"7a67d80fab4c6f75b4eb4e659e65ebfab25f852eedb8cddef581f1b75ad4877e"},"chapter":"第四章时间物体和滞留有限性","content":"分析。\n\n此外,胡塞尔同时也提出了(尽管放在了括弧中)一种切实的、实现的、纯粹的和绝对的消失之可能性，且正如我们将要看到的，他也假设滞留性和更广义的记忆从理论上讲都是无限的。\n\n把过去作为“某种时间前景”来分析便提出了双重意向性的主题，同时又把两种目标隔离开来。\n\n我们显然应当承认“意向性”一词的双重涵义，根据我们的观察，它要么指显现与显现之物的关系，要么指意识与“以意识方式显现之物”或者意识与以普通方式显现之物的关系。\n\n声音的对象是其纵向性的对象。但我们是否能把声音的对象与构成声音的对象分开，但又不丢掉声音之时间性的整体性呢？\n\n我们从流淌现象中得知，正是不断变动的持续性形成了不可分割的统一体：不可被分割为本身，又可能变成持续点的片断或阶段。①\n\n适用于片断与阶段的原则是否也适用于作为乐曲之音的乐曲的声音呢?\n\n我们在抽象中发现的碎片只能存在于流淌的整体中，流淌的持续阶段与持续点也是如此。[………]这个持续性[……]从形式上是不变的。[……]同理，每个瞬间(以及每个微小的时间段)与每个其他瞬间可以说有“个体的”不同。任何瞬间都不能发生两次，同样，任何流淌方式也不能发生两次。\n\n第四章时间物体和滞留有限性\n\n① 《内在时间意识的现象学讲座》,第41页。\n\n239","previous_page":238,"next_page":240}