{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","title":"技术与时间：2.迷失方向：人文与社会译丛","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544711999","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","id":"c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","uuid":"c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","title":"技术与时间：2.迷失方向：人文与社会译丛","normalized_title":"技术与时间2迷失方向人文与社会译丛","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544711999","isbns":["9787544711999"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":306,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%B8%8E%E6%97%B6%E9%97%B4%EF%BC%9A2.%E8%BF%B7%E5%A4%B1%E6%96%B9%E5%90%91%EF%BC%9A%E4%BA%BA%E6%96%87%E4%B8%8E%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E8%AF%91%E4%B8%9B","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88/search"},"page":{"printed_page":272,"pdf_page":281,"physical_index":281,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"7ad770b8262e63aad1058e7cedb6a55b4cf5777c5eb41ddb9d43c05387fd2a17"},"chapter":"第四章时间物体和滞留有限性","content":"传统的沉淀应当能被还原，以便使我们回归到原初的基础上；然而与此同时，正因存在着沉淀和传统，这种回归才成其为可能，\n\n仿佛现象的现象性只能在根本上与普罗米修斯原则一致的爱比米修斯原则中(作为已经在此，也是对普罗米修斯原则之重复的事后的爱比米修斯原则)自我给予，这是因为\n\n真正的“传统性”一贯被胡塞尔定义为经验现象，比如掌握使观念的传播与继承变得越来越容易的技术。即便胡塞尔不告诉我们这个技术生成是如何实现的，我们也知道它是建立在所有构成的时间连续性之上。意义产生的任何原初时刻都需要有一种“传统”，即已在实际性中构成的存在。\n\n所以我们必须描述观念化过程，也\n\n必须从“生存环境的前科学素材”出发，再回到前科学状态和原初观念性的生成①。\n\n19.技术的相关差异\n\n德里达于1953年提出了对《几何学起源》的解读②，而到了1961年，他又提出一种截然相反的解读，从而开启了真正的德里达哲学。胡塞尔的这一著作似乎抛弃了现象学自始就想方设法保留的东西：\n\n技术与时间\n\n① 《〈几何学起源〉导论》,第267页。\n\n②德里达于1990年针对这些句子声明：“我后来写道:不对,需要斟酌！”\n\n③ 同注解①。\n\n272","previous_page":271,"next_page":273}