{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","title":"技术与时间：2.迷失方向：人文与社会译丛","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544711999","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","id":"c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","uuid":"c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","title":"技术与时间：2.迷失方向：人文与社会译丛","normalized_title":"技术与时间2迷失方向人文与社会译丛","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544711999","isbns":["9787544711999"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":306,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%B8%8E%E6%97%B6%E9%97%B4%EF%BC%9A2.%E8%BF%B7%E5%A4%B1%E6%96%B9%E5%90%91%EF%BC%9A%E4%BA%BA%E6%96%87%E4%B8%8E%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E8%AF%91%E4%B8%9B","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88/search"},"page":{"printed_page":275,"pdf_page":284,"physical_index":284,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"bc5cdd95389e9e21843e59c566de151e04c1d8e7d815810da11ffedb0ae4d802"},"chapter":"第四章时间物体和滞留有限性","content":"类似于(如果不等同于的话)内在时间意识的过程[……]。当下的呈现既不像断裂也不像过去的结果，而是像过去之当下的滞留，也就是说像滞留的滞留等。活意识的滞留能力已经消失，但它以习惯和沉淀的形式把过去的意义、价值和行为保留下来。①\n\n这就导致了超前的优先地位:历史的当下“总是几乎立即指向寓于其中且总以计划的一般形式呈现的全部过去”②。这个超前就是迟到：“迟到的原初意识只能具有纯粹的超前形式”。如果意义的呈现条件存在于其重复的技术可能性中，那么直觉与意义的扩展则来自本身是技术构成的当即的扩展。文献性是原初的。言语属于“文献性”，但前提是\n\n语言的观念性是观念物体——也是沉淀物或人们的存储物——的栖身处。但这里的原初寄存(dokumentierung)并非记录某个私有物，而是制造某个公有物，即不再属于原初物主之物⑤。\n\n不可能有无终结的自我意识。与此同时，\n\n在生动且短暂的明证性之后，在有限且被动的滞留消失之后，意义可以在重新记忆行为中以“等同”的形式再制造；它并没有回到虚无中①。\n\n第四章 时间物体和滞留有限性\n\n①《〈几何学起源〉导论》,第45页。\n\n② 同上。\n\n③ 同上，第171页。\n\n④这里的意义来自让—吕克·玛里昂的《还原与给予》一书(第10—63页)。\n\n⑤《〈几何学起源〉导论》,第72页。\n\n275","previous_page":274,"next_page":276}