{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","title":"技术与时间：2.迷失方向：人文与社会译丛","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544711999","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","id":"c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","uuid":"c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","title":"技术与时间：2.迷失方向：人文与社会译丛","normalized_title":"技术与时间2迷失方向人文与社会译丛","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787544711999","isbns":["9787544711999"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":306,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E4%B8%8E%E6%97%B6%E9%97%B4%EF%BC%9A2.%E8%BF%B7%E5%A4%B1%E6%96%B9%E5%90%91%EF%BC%9A%E4%BA%BA%E6%96%87%E4%B8%8E%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E8%AF%91%E4%B8%9B","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/c377f608-9f8d-4e82-acf0-78a48f7daa88/search"},"page":{"printed_page":41,"pdf_page":50,"physical_index":50,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"0bd96c9487fb8b649231bf16b6d43898d4d8413bfd4b4213d27de9ce4c07a767"},"chapter":"第一章拼写文字的时代","content":"关差异的概念。\n\n直线型文字首次为通达言语的过渡(通达它正在过去的现在)和进入言语的过去(进入它作为过去的现在)开辟了文字途径。通达文字正是胡塞尔所追求的理念之条件。这里说的理念首先是几何理念，即“面对所有人的、永恒不变的”①可理解性。这种可理解性是意义重新活化的条件，后者又是理念的条件。然而，“业已缄默的史前奥秘、流逝的各种文明、讳莫如深或无从知晓的企图、守口如瓶的秘密和难以解读的碑铭[………]”所缺乏的恰恰是这样一种“对所有人的”可理解性。可理解性需要记录的精确性—从胡塞尔在其早期的现象学分析中赋予文献的地位上不难看出，他早已想到了这一层。所以，并不是所有的文字都能使科学的理念陈述共同体化：使其成为可能的是拼写这种能让人把想过的事当作发生过的事来“任意审视”(此乃莱布尼茨之语)的文字，即把思维作为其自身的、完全可以通达的过去来自我审视。但这并不意味着这个过去是透明的：思维的字面意义是通达语言原始书写内容的差异意义，因为我们总能以相同的方式重新通达此意义。这个事实开启了另一种相关差异。\n\n16.拼写的意向性\n\n无论是字母的还是非字母的，任何文字都少不了意向性。与未来关系的转化，即人类历史的开启，正是植根于这种意向性之中。分析确正的记录首先需要对纹迹的意义、死亡的经济学、超文字中的相关差异这些内容的意向性作出分析,这就需要“解构音位中心论”。\n\n这个解构注重的恰恰是如下事实：\n\n第一章拼写文字的时代\n\n① 雅克·德里达:《〈几何学起源〉导论》,第87页,PUF,1962年版。\n\n041","previous_page":40,"next_page":42}