{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009","title":"正义论","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7500402449","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009","id":"c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009","uuid":"c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009","title":"正义论","normalized_title":"正义论","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7500402449","isbns":["7500402449"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":624,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%AD%A3%E4%B9%89%E8%AE%BA","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009/search"},"page":{"printed_page":108,"pdf_page":120,"physical_index":120,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"c99de0d778b87732bbd8e3aa970520e10bf0faccd7f913e4838d87c17274160c"},"chapter":"第二章","content":"我相信，所有这些职责都被公平的原则包括在内。然而，有两种重要的情形可能没有充分地体现公平原则：一是当政治职责应用于普通公民而非应用于占居公职者的时候；一是守诺之责。在第一种情形中有些东西是不清楚的：比如，什么是履行公平原则的必要的约束行为，以及，谁已经履行过这种行为？我相信，严格地说，在一般情况下，对于普通公民并没有什么政治职责。在第二种情形里，需要解释受托之责是怎样从利用一种正义实践中产生出来的。我们需要深入考察与这种情况有关的实践的性质，我将在另一个地方讨论它们（见第51—52节）。\n\n①)在区别职责与自然义务时，我一直得益于H·哈特：《法律义务和道德义考》，载于《通德哲学论文集》，AL，麦尔登编（西雅图，华盛顿大学出版社，1958年版)，第100—105页，C，H，怀特莱：《论义务》，载于《亚团士多德协会会1刊》第53卷（1952—1953年），R，B.布兰特：《义务与责任的概念》，载于《精神》第73卷（1964年）\n\n108","previous_page":107,"next_page":109}