{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009","title":"正义论","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7500402449","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009","id":"c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009","uuid":"c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009","title":"正义论","normalized_title":"正义论","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7500402449","isbns":["7500402449"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":624,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%AD%A3%E4%B9%89%E8%AE%BA","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009/search"},"page":{"printed_page":192,"pdf_page":204,"physical_index":204,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"cbfd5f40fd6d8431233d38edb99df8618073bf77288fcd0b5320b33f675b74f8"},"chapter":"第二章","content":"这样，当个人摆脱某些限制而做（或不做）某事，并同时受到保护而免受其他人的侵犯时，我们就可以说他们是自由地做或不做某事的。例如，如果我们设想良心自由是由法律规定的，当个人可以自由地去追求道德、哲学、宗教方面的各种兴趣（利益），且法律并不要求他们从事或不从事任何特殊形式的宗教或其它活动，同时其他人也有勿干预别人的法律义务时，个人就具有这种良心自由。一系列相当微纱复杂的权利和义务表现了各种具体自由的特性。不仅个人做或不做某事的自由必须被允许，而且政府和他人必须负有不干涉的法律义务。我不想详细地叙述这些权利和义务，但是我认为：对于我们的目的来说，我们已足够好地理解了这些权利和义务的性质。\n\n①)这里我依据的是麦卡勒姆的《在反两方面的自由》中的观点。此外可参见费利克斯·奥本海姆：《自由的范围》（纽约，圣马丁出版社，1961年版），特别是第109一118、132一134页，在那里社会自由的概念也是从三个方面定义的。\n\n192","previous_page":191,"next_page":193}