{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009","title":"正义论","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7500402449","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009","id":"c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009","uuid":"c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009","title":"正义论","normalized_title":"正义论","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7500402449","isbns":["7500402449"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":624,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%AD%A3%E4%B9%89%E8%AE%BA","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009/search"},"page":{"printed_page":206,"pdf_page":218,"physical_index":218,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"4f892084c025f2099133a63e89bec27759c54c94aed9ede746f4820bf4a9e392"},"chapter":"第二章","content":"35. 对不宽容者的宽容\n\n现在我们来考虑正义是否要求对不宽容者的宽容，以及倘若要求，条件是什么。这个问题产生于各种复杂的情形。民主国家的某些政党信奉这样的理论，这种理论使它们一旦大权在握便要压制宪法规定的自由。再如，有些反对思想自由的人却在大学里占据高位。在这些情况中若对他们也宽容似乎与正义原则相违，或至少不是正义原则所要求的。我将联系宗教宽容来讨论这个问题。通过适当的改变，这个论证也可以扩大到其它事例中。\n\n①) 关于新教收革名的观点可见J.E.E.D，阿克顿勘爵：《关于迫害的新教理论》，载《历史山及其它》（伦敦，支克米兰公司，1907年版）。关于洛克的观点，见《关于定字的通信》，同《政府论》下篇收在一起，J.W，高夫编（牛津，巴兹尔·布某克书尔公司，1964年版），第156一158页。\n\n206","previous_page":205,"next_page":207}