{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009","title":"正义论","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7500402449","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009","id":"c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009","uuid":"c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009","title":"正义论","normalized_title":"正义论","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"7500402449","isbns":["7500402449"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":624,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%AD%A3%E4%B9%89%E8%AE%BA","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/c3e269f2-c36d-4862-98ef-fa37a2f8b009/search"},"page":{"printed_page":581,"pdf_page":593,"physical_index":593,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"fae6a7113785f4385abe509baa597140afcba260fe8d595d98753ec2623a74a9"},"chapter":"第九章","content":"作为一种政治行为 353，\n\n与对法律的忠诚 354，\n\n与好斗行为的区别 355\n\n非暴力反抗的恰当对象369\n\n其正当性证明的三个条件360一364,\n\n非暴力反抗中的公平问题361；\n\n非暴力反抗的明智364，\n\n在维护民主宪法中的作用370一374\n\n基于正义观念之上的非暴力反抗理论372\n\n在宪法理论中的地位 373\n\n与各种类型的一致意见 3753\n\n公民在非暴力反抗方面的责任376—379;\n\n非理想理论(Noaideal theury) 234 238, 292, 339, 379;\n\n参见部分服从理论\n\n非通常意义(lllocutionary forces)391,\n\n分工 (Division of labor) 516, 527,\n\n分裂的观念(Splitting,idea of)182;\n\n分配部门(Distribution branch) 267270\n\n分配的正义(Distributive justice)其卡要问题 2，5，56，79；\n\n与纯粹程序正义 82作为符合德性的幸福299—302并非惩罚的正义的对立面 303;\n\n份外的道德(Supererogatian，moral-ity of) 464, 470;\n\n份外（的）行为（Supererogation acts) 120, 183, 327, 425, 536,\n\n福利的人际比较（Interpessonal com-\n\nparisons of wellbeing)\n\n功利主义中的人际福和比较86，313,\n\n作为公平的正义中的人际福利比较87, 90;\n\n基本善在人际福利比较中的作用87, 90, 203;\n\n与期望的统一166\n\n与某些基本功利程序 310—31S\n\n福利的人际比较中的道德前提312福祉（Blessedness） 537;\n\n富尔斯标准（Fuchs criterion）93①\n\n复杂性（Complexity）对复杂性的限制41，126，136，503;\n\n康德伦理学不是一种负作伦理学246,\n\n与差耻的区别432，4703\n\n对权威的负罪感452；  \n与自然态度 452，456，461，473—476,\n\n对社团的负罪感456\n\n对原则的负罪感 460;\n\n合理的负罪感的规定461；\n\n负罪感的心理上的可理解性462负罪感的解释468；\n\n精经病患者的负罪感468；\n\n负罪感的残余468\n\n作为一种道德情操的负罪感的特点468;\n\n与道德的诸方面 470\n\n与终结性条件 561；\n\nG\n\n个人的道德价值(Moral worth of per-\n\n581","previous_page":580,"next_page":582}