{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ca7a386a-a284-41ec-b146-be626cc2ac01","title":"非人：漫谈时间","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787562155560","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ca7a386a-a284-41ec-b146-be626cc2ac01","id":"ca7a386a-a284-41ec-b146-be626cc2ac01","uuid":"ca7a386a-a284-41ec-b146-be626cc2ac01","title":"非人：漫谈时间","normalized_title":"非人漫谈时间","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787562155560","isbns":["9787562155560","9782252039427"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":325,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ca7a386a-a284-41ec-b146-be626cc2ac01","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E9%9D%9E%E4%BA%BA%EF%BC%9A%E6%BC%AB%E8%B0%88%E6%97%B6%E9%97%B4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ca7a386a-a284-41ec-b146-be626cc2ac01/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ca7a386a-a284-41ec-b146-be626cc2ac01/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ca7a386a-a284-41ec-b146-be626cc2ac01","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ca7a386a-a284-41ec-b146-be626cc2ac01/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ca7a386a-a284-41ec-b146-be626cc2ac01/search"},"page":{"printed_page":104,"pdf_page":124,"physical_index":124,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"4b93c7d0bf4dc1d66f0bf50feac59c4e8f61dce200afb8cbc5c486e2d8bfd38b"},"chapter":"非人：漫谈时间","content":"些话语类型与生产性想象原则联系在一起。但是我们会注意到，这样的想象在科学自身中也发挥着同等的作用，发挥着启发的作用(科学为了进步需要启发）。这些多样甚至异质的形式所77 拥有的共同点是，自由和无准备。通过自由和无准备，语言证明它可以迎接能在“言说之场”发生的事情，而且可以通达发生的事件。这样，我们就可以自问:真正的复杂性不是就包含在这种感受性里而非包含在——如同卡尔纳普提出的—“还原和构成”语言的活动里吗?\n\n最后，如果一种理性(rationalité)否定它是大部分语言—包括认知语言——里的开放的感受性和无法掌控的创造力的构成部分，那么它就不值其名。由于它确实带有这样的否定，技术的、科学的和经济的理性还是更应该适合“意识形态”这个名称，如果这个术语不带有太多的形而上学预设。无论怎样，肯定的事情是:共识模式(有人宣称向科学的论证共同体借用了它而且将之作为理想推荐给全人类社会)，它证明了在怎样的程度上这种“理性”在话语类型——语言是其潜在状态—的多样性上行使了霸权。为了将这种理性称为是理性的，应该要把面临宇宙挑战、操控大单子逻辑的操演性(performativité)接受为唯一的价值。\n\n(4)这里我的假设是第二假设，大家不会对此感到惊讶。有能力迎接并不准备去思考的思想，就是适当地呼唤思考。这种态度，我说过，不仅仅存在于著名的理性语言里，也存在于诗歌、艺术和日常语言里，如果它至少对于进步的认知话语来说是根本的。\n\n104\n\n/非人：漫谈时间","previous_page":103,"next_page":null}