{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ca7a386a-a284-41ec-b146-be626cc2ac01","title":"非人：漫谈时间","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787562155560","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ca7a386a-a284-41ec-b146-be626cc2ac01","id":"ca7a386a-a284-41ec-b146-be626cc2ac01","uuid":"ca7a386a-a284-41ec-b146-be626cc2ac01","title":"非人：漫谈时间","normalized_title":"非人漫谈时间","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787562155560","isbns":["9787562155560","9782252039427"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":325,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ca7a386a-a284-41ec-b146-be626cc2ac01","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E9%9D%9E%E4%BA%BA%EF%BC%9A%E6%BC%AB%E8%B0%88%E6%97%B6%E9%97%B4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ca7a386a-a284-41ec-b146-be626cc2ac01/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ca7a386a-a284-41ec-b146-be626cc2ac01/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ca7a386a-a284-41ec-b146-be626cc2ac01","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ca7a386a-a284-41ec-b146-be626cc2ac01/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ca7a386a-a284-41ec-b146-be626cc2ac01/search"},"page":{"printed_page":239,"pdf_page":259,"physical_index":259,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"37928488cd89693c8d7967a8877f196e90608a24838f6a834c146f941cf823fd"},"chapter":"非人：漫谈时间","content":"(如同维也纳圈子里的学者曾说过的，也就是清楚解释)一切在空间和数字的系统里被假定的命题吗？或者科学思想是被迫把时空属性的直觉引入到看起来确定的公理展示中的吗？科学思想既不能消除也不能推断这些直觉，更不能预设它们。它们就是在强意义上说的材料(données)。关系到我们的主题，问题很清楚:我们可以完整构建时间而无需参照倾听吗？在倾听中，发挥作用的是或近或远的记忆、在场、期待、波动、波动的形式化本身，简而言之，是一切内在时间、内在感觉。\n\n没有多个类似，但是有一个可以想象的类似：一方面，几何、算术和力学的“根基的危机”，与另一方面，一个多世纪(人们也用另一个不受欢迎的表达来规定这一个多世纪，即先锋派运动）以来大多数艺术所接受的对明见性（évidence)的质疑之间类似。这两者的重要性当然是不同的：力求认识声音的属性与力图从声音中生出情感并不是相同的事情。康德说:以决定的方式判断与以反思的方式判断不是同一回事情。但是如果这种情感不再被预判，比如不再以自然愉悦或者趣味的名义进行预判，而且如果科学从它的角度追问这些概念，那么谁也不会反对科学家的研究对艺术家研究其他“闻所未闻的”情感的帮助。瓦雷兹反对把艺术与科学分离开来。\n\n他提到音乐在中世纪的博雅教育(artslibéraux)划分中所占据的位置：\n\n听从\n\n239\n\n167","previous_page":238,"next_page":null}