{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ca7a386a-a284-41ec-b146-be626cc2ac01","title":"非人：漫谈时间","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787562155560","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ca7a386a-a284-41ec-b146-be626cc2ac01","id":"ca7a386a-a284-41ec-b146-be626cc2ac01","uuid":"ca7a386a-a284-41ec-b146-be626cc2ac01","title":"非人：漫谈时间","normalized_title":"非人漫谈时间","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787562155560","isbns":["9787562155560","9782252039427"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":325,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ca7a386a-a284-41ec-b146-be626cc2ac01","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E9%9D%9E%E4%BA%BA%EF%BC%9A%E6%BC%AB%E8%B0%88%E6%97%B6%E9%97%B4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ca7a386a-a284-41ec-b146-be626cc2ac01/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ca7a386a-a284-41ec-b146-be626cc2ac01/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ca7a386a-a284-41ec-b146-be626cc2ac01","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ca7a386a-a284-41ec-b146-be626cc2ac01/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ca7a386a-a284-41ec-b146-be626cc2ac01/search"},"page":{"printed_page":86,"pdf_page":106,"physical_index":106,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"2ae46dca204ae35bbf2db554c3ea4dcb065348353577622d02121683ebb8727e"},"chapter":"非人：漫谈时间","content":"由于它是绝对的，它所呈现的当下不是可把握的:它还没有或者它已经不再在场了。要把握呈现本身并且呈现它，总是要么太早，要么太晚。这就是事件的特殊而又矛盾的构建。某事发生,意外事件(occurrence),意味着精神被去私人化(1'espritest déproprié)。表达法“发生….”(Il arrive que)表达的是自身对自身的非掌控。事件使得自己不能占有和掌控它之所是。这就证明：自身在本质上应承受不断回返的异己性之苦。\n\n通过这个标题，我的发言显然是受到这种感受性(passibilité)的保护。这个发言完全没有以对它所界定的指涉物的，甚至理论上的完全掌控为目标。我只希望实现对现代性处理时间条件的种种方式中的某些进行隔离。\n\n从呈现的角度对时间进行的这一简短提醒，在概念上表现65 为在时间上赋予非连续性、“离散”(discret)和差异的优先权。显然，这种描述预设了，如同它的对立面和补充，把相当数目的互相区分的时刻(至少潜在地)汇集和持存在一个唯一的“在场”(présence)中的能力。正如这个词所示，意识牵涉记忆，一种胡塞尔意义上的基本“持存”(Retention)。把综合与非连续性对立起来时，意识似乎就向异己性发起了挑战。在这冲突里，问题的关键在于:界定这样的限度，即意识可以揽括各种(如今天人们所说，“信息”的)时刻而且“每次”必然将这些时刻现时化(actualiser)。\n\n86\n\n/非人：漫谈时间","previous_page":85,"next_page":null}