{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"cd687a16-ff79-40f8-a0cc-84b63e8e697f","title":"时间社会学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303096213","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"cd687a16-ff79-40f8-a0cc-84b63e8e697f","id":"cd687a16-ff79-40f8-a0cc-84b63e8e697f","uuid":"cd687a16-ff79-40f8-a0cc-84b63e8e697f","title":"时间社会学","normalized_title":"时间社会学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303096213","isbns":["9787303096213","0333440927"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":302,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/cd687a16-ff79-40f8-a0cc-84b63e8e697f","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%97%B6%E9%97%B4%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/cd687a16-ff79-40f8-a0cc-84b63e8e697f/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/cd687a16-ff79-40f8-a0cc-84b63e8e697f/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/cd687a16-ff79-40f8-a0cc-84b63e8e697f","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/cd687a16-ff79-40f8-a0cc-84b63e8e697f/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/cd687a16-ff79-40f8-a0cc-84b63e8e697f/search"},"page":{"printed_page":135,"pdf_page":181,"physical_index":181,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"964a27fdcd09b9ee3d12ce39c9cbcb202141584b79eb125b43792f089e4ab0b4"},"chapter":"第八章资本主义与“工作一时间”思想史","content":"与保护儿童的法律相对立的立场难以在道德上得到辩护，这可以解释以下情况：一旦共识达成，那些经济学家就不会再公开宣扬上述对立立场。②这还可以解释他们急于抓住由西尼尔（Senior）抛给他们的“救生索”的迫切性，这条“救生索”把争论的主题从个人自由和道德转向了生产过程。西尼尔认为，必须反对工厂运动，因为它们会消除利润，进而毁掉工业。但是，他的应急性论题犯了根本性错误，而且带有明显的偏见，所以绝大多数经济学家都不能接受。但是，他的核心观点“固定资本与流动资本的大比率关系使长时间的工作更可取”，③却被广泛地认为是正确的。他的关于缩短工作时间长度会导致产量成一定比例下降的假说，和他的结论——10小时工作法案会导致价格上涨，进而破坏英国经济———一样，几乎都没有受到质疑。19世纪40年代，经济学家们为了反对工厂运动，展开了这些围绕着生产（过程）的争论。必须反对对工作一时间的限制，因为它会给贸易带来不利影响，而且也会使得与工人要求相对立的立场获得道德上的恰当性因为如果经济衰退，工人们也必然会遭受损失。尽管先前这种性质的法律的确没有导致这种情况，但是必须承认，这些先例已经不再适用于现在的情况了。\n\n第几章资本王义与“工作一时阁”恩慧史\n\n① Blaug, M. (1958) The Classical Economists and the Factory Acts— A Reexamination', Quarterly Journal of Economics, 72, p. 212.\n\n② Ricciardi, J. (1981) ‘Class Struggle, the Classical Economists and the Factory Acts: Towards a Reformulation', Research in Political Economy, 4, pp. 91-92.\n\n③ Senior, N. (1837) Letters on the Factory Acts, London: B. Fellows, p. 11.\n\n135","previous_page":134,"next_page":136}