{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ce325a04-5bc9-4819-a776-439d90410b32","title":"Migrant Labour in the Gig Economy The Intersection of Migrant Labour, Platform Capitalism, and Resistance","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9783031912610","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ce325a04-5bc9-4819-a776-439d90410b32","id":"ce325a04-5bc9-4819-a776-439d90410b32","uuid":"ce325a04-5bc9-4819-a776-439d90410b32","title":"Migrant Labour in the Gig Economy The Intersection of Migrant Labour, Platform Capitalism, and Resistance","normalized_title":"migrantlabourinthegigeconomytheintersectionofmigrantlabourplatformcapitalismandresistance","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9783031912610","isbns":["9783031912610","9783031912627"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":270,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ce325a04-5bc9-4819-a776-439d90410b32","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Migrant%20Labour%20in%20the%20Gig%20Economy%20The%20Intersection%20of%20Migrant%20Labour%2C%20Platform%20Capitalism%2C%20and%20Resistance","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ce325a04-5bc9-4819-a776-439d90410b32/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ce325a04-5bc9-4819-a776-439d90410b32/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ce325a04-5bc9-4819-a776-439d90410b32","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ce325a04-5bc9-4819-a776-439d90410b32/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ce325a04-5bc9-4819-a776-439d90410b32/search"},"page":{"printed_page":61,"pdf_page":75,"physical_index":75,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"32eb91e6f391853dcd9f5786e33d2fe22678ca912e72693785a106044f66851f"},"chapter":"Dynamics ofVirtual Work","content":"Notably, although, some scholars have also criticised the use of refeudalisation as an oversimplified and inadequate way of looking at the dynamics of contemporary capitalism. In a recent article, for instance, Morozov (2022) sharply criticised and rejected the most common positions supporting the return of feudal mechanisms into capitalism. Many today, from both the political right and the left, argue that we are in an era often described as neo-feudalism or techno-feudalism. Among the liberal thinkers, such as in the case of Posner and Weyl (2018), the return to a feudal realm is the cause of a stuck economy incapable of innovation because corroded by politics, in the same way feudalism was unable to promote the good development of societies (and they claim consequently for an even more radical and free spirit of the market). On the left, it is possible to find many more thinkers arguing for a feudal resurgence. From Mazzuccato (2019) to Varoufakis (2023) and Streeck (2017), many of those leftist scholars argue that economic and political social relations have gradually eroded, moving backwards towards a mechanism more akin to the feudal one between servants and lords than the capitalist one between capital and labour. While Varoufakis (2023) focuses more on the perverse mechanisms of global finance and the role of international economic organisations in strangling the growth of countries, Mazzucato (2019), with the idea of digital feudalism, criticises the immense profits of tech companies that dominate the global economy and hold national governments hostage, even though their growth was made possible by public investment (Mazzucato, 2018). Of course, these discussions also raise important questions, such as what kind of wealth creation underlies the Amazon or Uber model, whether it is purely rentier or also productive and innovative. None of them, indeed, goes so far as to say that the economy has returned to aspects of the Middle Ages, but the arguments they use still draw on some correspondences with the past. This, according to Morozov (2022), does not help to understand the real extent of the transformations taking place and leads to underestimating the elements of continuity that some aspects considered feudal have always had in the development of capitalism, as well as to ignoring the elements of complexity that always permeate global development processes with contradictions. In his conclusions, he therefore distances himself from these interpretations, arguing that, refeudalisation or not, the features highlighted by the proponents of the feudal reason are still attributable to capitalism as such.\n\n3 DIGITAL CAPORALATO AND MIGRANT LABOUR IN THE GIG\n\n61","previous_page":60,"next_page":62}