{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ce325a04-5bc9-4819-a776-439d90410b32","title":"Migrant Labour in the Gig Economy The Intersection of Migrant Labour, Platform Capitalism, and Resistance","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9783031912610","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ce325a04-5bc9-4819-a776-439d90410b32","id":"ce325a04-5bc9-4819-a776-439d90410b32","uuid":"ce325a04-5bc9-4819-a776-439d90410b32","title":"Migrant Labour in the Gig Economy The Intersection of Migrant Labour, Platform Capitalism, and Resistance","normalized_title":"migrantlabourinthegigeconomytheintersectionofmigrantlabourplatformcapitalismandresistance","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9783031912610","isbns":["9783031912610","9783031912627"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":270,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ce325a04-5bc9-4819-a776-439d90410b32","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Migrant%20Labour%20in%20the%20Gig%20Economy%20The%20Intersection%20of%20Migrant%20Labour%2C%20Platform%20Capitalism%2C%20and%20Resistance","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ce325a04-5bc9-4819-a776-439d90410b32/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ce325a04-5bc9-4819-a776-439d90410b32/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ce325a04-5bc9-4819-a776-439d90410b32","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ce325a04-5bc9-4819-a776-439d90410b32/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ce325a04-5bc9-4819-a776-439d90410b32/search"},"page":{"printed_page":8,"pdf_page":24,"physical_index":24,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"a454024a6dc3d3f99e7ae0a3e8f75f9a297a7f305e17d366a5ac095ea825e3a4"},"chapter":"Dynamics ofVirtual Work","content":"The Bengali-speaking Muslim migrants are often termed as Bangladeshi and endure routine harassment and discrimination from the ruling dispensation (Paul, 2023). Their assumed ‘illegal immigrants’/ ‘infiltrator’ positioning within the neoliberal-Hindutva state narrative, is both colonial in nature and communal in character. By eulogizing border regimes and migrant bureaucracy on the one hand it upholds the racial supremacy; on the other hand by equating religious identity with nationality, it evokes questions on the secular premises of citizenship. So, when one thinks of conceptualizing migration and gig work, often migration is imagined as a cross-border, transnational activity. But in the case of South Asia, especially India, it’s the rural-to-urban, cross-state migration that due to its peculiar religious-linguistic composition, brings in pertinent questions of citizenry rights within the national border.\n\nThe recent scholarship has shown (Iqubbal, 2021; Rathi & Tandon, 2021; Raval, 2020) that there is a significant correlation between migration and participation in gig work in India. They also argued ‘migrant gig work is always the outcome of a complex interplay between institutional (dis)embeddedness, personal and professional life trajectories, and (self-) organised forms of labor struggle’ (Katta et al., 2024). Across South Asia the lived experience of marginalized communities like oppressed castes, religious minorities and women particularly, exposes the multilayered relationship between social identity and labor process. But how these social ruptures engage with the platform capital, there hasn’t much discussion about that.\n\nUrbanization, emergence, and expansion of cities are a direct outcome of deepening of capitalist expansion and the centralization of surplus produced within it. Right to City as a critique of the capitalist cities, as well as a slogan of inclusive and democratic cities (Lefebvre, 1968) emerged at a particular juncture of capitalism.\n\nHarvey (2008) along with a host of other geographers deepened Lefebvre’s framework to emphasize and underline that ‘[t]he question of what kind of city we want cannot be divorced from that of what kind of social ties, relationship to nature, lifestyles, technologies and aesthetic values we desire.’ While Lefebvre’s framework saw Right to City more as a question of individual freedom to access resources; Harvey expanded it to include the right of the commons or the working class.\n\nThe present phase of capitalism with the hegemonic impulse of the finance capital has brought in a specific set of temporality to our universe.\n\n8\n\nF. DELLA PUPPA ET AL.","previous_page":7,"next_page":9}