{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"cfa147d3-494e-49cc-b356-7aceff50b181","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"cfa147d3-494e-49cc-b356-7aceff50b181","id":"cfa147d3-494e-49cc-b356-7aceff50b181","uuid":"cfa147d3-494e-49cc-b356-7aceff50b181","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","normalized_title":"marxandtheconceptofhistoricaltime","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":216,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/cfa147d3-494e-49cc-b356-7aceff50b181","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Marx%20and%20the%20Concept%20of%20Historical%20Time","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/cfa147d3-494e-49cc-b356-7aceff50b181/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/cfa147d3-494e-49cc-b356-7aceff50b181/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/cfa147d3-494e-49cc-b356-7aceff50b181","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/cfa147d3-494e-49cc-b356-7aceff50b181/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/cfa147d3-494e-49cc-b356-7aceff50b181/search"},"page":{"printed_page":105,"pdf_page":109,"physical_index":109,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"3c49d7f2c09ffacb62cdb6be195606eea937bbdf71ac5e821b552b56d3d387cc"},"chapter":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","content":"<sup>27</sup> Postone, Time, Labor, and Social Domination, 144. For Marx, therefore, ‘…the commodity does not contain two different sorts of labour; the same labour, however, is determined as different and as opposed to itself.’ Quoted in ibid.\n\n<sup>28</sup> The ambiguity within Marx’s account of use-value is far more pervasive than that within his account of labour-power. In the Grundrisse, the 1861-63 Manuscripts, and the Marginal Notes on Wagner, usevalue is characterised as a decidedly economic and historical category, whereas a number of passages in the first volume of Capital and the Contribution would seem to suggest that it is a category ‘outside the sphere of investigation of political economy.’ Marx, Contribution, 28. Marx should be critiqued on this front. Use-value, this thesis maintains, is only intelligible as an economic and historical category specific to capitalism. Use-value, which Marx too often conflates with ‘utility’ [Nutzen], is internal to value, even as it is produced as exterior to it. That is, use-value stands opposed to exchange-value, but only within the value-form. This will be further developed in our analysis of the dialectic of concrete and abstract labour-time.\n\n<sup>29</sup> Marx, Capital 1, 137. Emphasis added.\n\n<sup>30</sup> Karl Marx, Randglossen zu Adolph Wagner’s Lehrbuch der politischen Ökonomie [1879-80], in Marx and Engels, MEW, Band 19 (Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1987), 370.\n\n<sup>31</sup> Marx, Capital 1, 1007.\n\n<sup>32</sup> Osborne, ‘Marx and the philosophy of time’, 19.\n\n<sup>33</sup> Werner Bonefeld is mistaken in his position that figuring concrete labour ‘as a specifically capitalist form of labour’ amounts to an ‘absurd notion.’ Werner Bonefeld, ‘Abstract labour: Against its nature and on its time’, Capital & Class 34:2 (2010), 270. Categorically, in its meaning as the dialectical other of abstract labour, ‘concrete labour’ is a specifically capitalist form of labour.\n\n105","previous_page":104,"next_page":106}