{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"cfa147d3-494e-49cc-b356-7aceff50b181","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"cfa147d3-494e-49cc-b356-7aceff50b181","id":"cfa147d3-494e-49cc-b356-7aceff50b181","uuid":"cfa147d3-494e-49cc-b356-7aceff50b181","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","normalized_title":"marxandtheconceptofhistoricaltime","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":216,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/cfa147d3-494e-49cc-b356-7aceff50b181","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Marx%20and%20the%20Concept%20of%20Historical%20Time","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/cfa147d3-494e-49cc-b356-7aceff50b181/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/cfa147d3-494e-49cc-b356-7aceff50b181/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/cfa147d3-494e-49cc-b356-7aceff50b181","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/cfa147d3-494e-49cc-b356-7aceff50b181/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/cfa147d3-494e-49cc-b356-7aceff50b181/search"},"page":{"printed_page":151,"pdf_page":155,"physical_index":155,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"ad2d6c2f2cc2a8a04fbf5da195f8234bb785ec1e88b2c8b52c438685a7f57a6b"},"chapter":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","content":"Over the last thirty to forty years, a common reading of the relationship between history and subsumption has arisen, which for all its internal variations holds two basic assumptions.<sup>54</sup> First, ‘subsumption’ in Marx can be understood as a category of historical periodisation, such that successive periods of history (no matter how they are demarcated) directly correspond to successive phases of formal and real subsumption. The precise meaning of formal as opposed to real subsumption in these accounts varies, but the conviction that formal subsumption both logically and historically precedes real subsumption is firm.<sup>55</sup> Theses readings are exclusively limited to the history of Western Europe. Second, the contemporary (the early 1970s onwards) phase of real subsumption can be taken as what Jacques Camatte calls the ‘total subsumption of labour under capital.’<sup>56</sup> This is the manner in which real subsumption has, one might state, ‘completed’ the subsumption of labour under capital. There are two passages<sup>57</sup> that exemplify these two assumptions, particularly that of ‘total subsumption’. The first comes from Fredric\n\n<sup>53</sup> Ibid. 381.\n\n<sup>54</sup> Despite its shortcomings, the Endnotes Collective provides a useful and critical introduction to this reading. See http://endnotes.org.uk/en/endnotes-the-history-of-subsumption (accessed 27 April 2015). The primary focus of this article is the French group Théorie Communiste.\n\n55 See e.g. Étienne Balibar, ‘Elements for a Theory of Transition’, in Althusser and Balibar, Reading Capital, 302-3, wherein formal subsumption ‘begins with the form of outwork on behalf of a merchant capitalist and ends with the industrial revolution.’ For Balibar, formal subsumption thus coincides with Marx’s analysis of manufacture, and possesses the structure and form of a transition wherein there is a distinct non-correspondence – a dislocation – between the forces and relations of production.\n\n<sup>56</sup> Jacques Camatte, Capital and Community [1976], trans. David Brown (London: Unpopular Books, 1988), 45. I am indebted to the Endnotes Collective for this reference.\n\n<sup>57</sup> I am indebted to Andrés Sáenz de Sicilia for both of these references.\n\n151","previous_page":150,"next_page":152}