{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"cfa147d3-494e-49cc-b356-7aceff50b181","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"cfa147d3-494e-49cc-b356-7aceff50b181","id":"cfa147d3-494e-49cc-b356-7aceff50b181","uuid":"cfa147d3-494e-49cc-b356-7aceff50b181","title":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","normalized_title":"marxandtheconceptofhistoricaltime","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":216,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/cfa147d3-494e-49cc-b356-7aceff50b181","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Marx%20and%20the%20Concept%20of%20Historical%20Time","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/cfa147d3-494e-49cc-b356-7aceff50b181/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/cfa147d3-494e-49cc-b356-7aceff50b181/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/cfa147d3-494e-49cc-b356-7aceff50b181","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/cfa147d3-494e-49cc-b356-7aceff50b181/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/cfa147d3-494e-49cc-b356-7aceff50b181/search"},"page":{"printed_page":156,"pdf_page":160,"physical_index":160,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"b788852b0c4c73c79b7eedafc341decec317d92697e32619b052692ad5e65a88"},"chapter":"Marx and the Concept of Historical Time","content":"In the Results of the Immediate Production-Process, there is a compelling passage that describes the relationship between automation and the production-process in temporal terms. Remarking on the difference between the labour already contained in the means of production and the labour which is added to the production-process, Marx writes:\n\nThe two kinds of labour are distinguished only by the fact that the one is already objectified in use-values while the other is in the process of being so objectified. The one is in the past, the other in the present; the one dead, the other living; the one objectified in the past, the other objectifying itself in the present. To the extent that past labour replaces living labour, it itself becomes a process, valorises itself; it becomes a fluens that creates a fluxion. This absorption into itself of additional living labour is its process of self-valorisation, its authentic transformation into capital, into value generating itself, its transformation from a constant amount of value into a variable value in a state of process. 69\n\n<sup>66</sup> Ibid. 526.\n\n<sup>67</sup> Marx, Grundrisse, 694.\n\n<sup>68</sup> Marx, Capital 1, 984.\n\n<sup>69</sup> Ibid. 994. If a fluens is a ‘flowing’, then a fluxion is, after Isaac Newton, this flowing as a continuous function. This passage must be read in conjunction with the following passage from the Grundrisse: ‘The communal substance of all commodities, i.e. their substance not as material stuff, as physical character, but their communal substance as commodities and hence exchange-values, is this, that they are objectified labour. The only thing distinct from objectified labour is non-objectified labour, labour which is still objectifying itself, labour as subjectivity. Or, objectified labour, i.e. labour which is present in space, can also be opposed, as past labour, to labour which is present in time. If it is to be\n\n156","previous_page":155,"next_page":157}