{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"d06b946b-6924-4f30-afbd-92f915edbae4","title":"State Platform Capitalism","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9781009619714","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"d06b946b-6924-4f30-afbd-92f915edbae4","id":"d06b946b-6924-4f30-afbd-92f915edbae4","uuid":"d06b946b-6924-4f30-afbd-92f915edbae4","title":"State Platform Capitalism","normalized_title":"stateplatformcapitalism","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9781009619714","isbns":["9781009619714","9781009446594","9781009446587"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":98,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/d06b946b-6924-4f30-afbd-92f915edbae4","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/State%20Platform%20Capitalism","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/d06b946b-6924-4f30-afbd-92f915edbae4/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/d06b946b-6924-4f30-afbd-92f915edbae4/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/d06b946b-6924-4f30-afbd-92f915edbae4","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/d06b946b-6924-4f30-afbd-92f915edbae4/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/d06b946b-6924-4f30-afbd-92f915edbae4/search"},"page":{"printed_page":3,"pdf_page":8,"physical_index":8,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"46e9491c26897817bdcf3292d5b1b0751dea45bc54c189bb6bffac0be11ed037"},"chapter":"Cambridge Elements","content":"Neoliberal globalization was underpinned by optimistic narrative of liberal peace underpinned by economic integration. In this ‘flat’ world, developing countries would supposedly be unencumbered by the demands of great powers or threatening neighbours. In exchange for opening their markets to firms from the developed countries, they could leverage their distinctive advantages to achieve growth and prosperity. Transnational economic integration instantiated a ‘partial shift of some components of state sovereignty to other institutions’ such as multinational corporations and international organizations (Sassen, 1996, 146).\n\nHowever, neoliberalism did not simply erode state power (Comunello and Mulargia, 2023). Rather, some states and some firms gained considerable influence and control over the strategic flows and nodes that underpinned global networks, even as others saw their power wane. So even while economies became increasingly interdependent through radical increases in flows of goods, trade, and investment, power relations remained profoundly asymmetric. Critically, the United States was able to maintain its handle on many (if not all) of the key ‘chokepoints’ within transnational networks.\n\nMuch ofthis new architecture ofnetworked power remained hidden from view until conflicts over networks burst into the open during the first Trump presidency (Farrell and Newman, 2023). Trump’s first administration made clear that great power competition had not been superseded by globalization. Since he launched his ‘trade war’ on China early during his first term, the United States and China have become locked in an increasingly intense and all-encompassing rivalry increasingly analogous to the Cold War (Schindler et al., 2024). But in contrast to the Cold War, which produced a world divided economically into largely isolated territorial blocs, contemporary geopolitical rivalry is unfolding in the networked world that globalization built (Schindler and Rolf, 2024). Rather than a great unravelling ofglobalized networks, events since 2016 have driven states to radically expand their definitions of national security to include the ability to secure supply chains, access internationally integrated financial systems, and develop new technologies in innovation networks (Drezner, 2024). This expansive definition of national security – while it has encouraged states to make everdeeper interventions to securitize their economies – has not yet undermined globalization in aggregate (Babić et al., 2022).\n\nState Platform Capitalism\n\n3","previous_page":2,"next_page":4}