{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"d1c31cd8-6afd-4ea5-b7b0-085c26a4e406","title":"Curation in the Age of Platform Capitalism  The Value of Selection, Narration, and Expertise in New Media Cultures","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9781032023007","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"d1c31cd8-6afd-4ea5-b7b0-085c26a4e406","id":"d1c31cd8-6afd-4ea5-b7b0-085c26a4e406","uuid":"d1c31cd8-6afd-4ea5-b7b0-085c26a4e406","title":"Curation in the Age of Platform Capitalism  The Value of Selection, Narration, and Expertise in New Media Cultures","normalized_title":"curationintheageofplatformcapitalismthevalueofselectionnarrationandexpertiseinnewmediacultures","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9781032023007","isbns":["9781032023007","9781032023014","9781003182801"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":177,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/d1c31cd8-6afd-4ea5-b7b0-085c26a4e406","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Curation%20in%20the%20Age%20of%20Platform%20Capitalism%20%20The%20Value%20of%20Selection%2C%20Narration%2C%20and%20Expertise%20in%20New%20Media%20Cultures","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/d1c31cd8-6afd-4ea5-b7b0-085c26a4e406/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/d1c31cd8-6afd-4ea5-b7b0-085c26a4e406/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/d1c31cd8-6afd-4ea5-b7b0-085c26a4e406","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/d1c31cd8-6afd-4ea5-b7b0-085c26a4e406/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/d1c31cd8-6afd-4ea5-b7b0-085c26a4e406/search"},"page":{"printed_page":144,"pdf_page":154,"physical_index":154,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"a1523ddd7683447aee2d6b43da399d67c10eab6c214dbcf7d1cb857aae8dc875"},"chapter":"CURATION IN THE AGE OF PLATFORM CAPITALISM","content":"This is also the departure point of positive psychology, according to which traumas should not be simply encountered so that we understand and reflect on them, but they should be molded into feelings of happiness. Martin Seligman in his bestseller Authentic Happiness (2002), for instance, believes that through constantly maintaining an optimist outlook we can eventually uphold a protective shield that would guard our well-beings from external negativity. This corresponds to the trait of resilience that requires a constant attitude of optimism, flexibility, and adaptability, as damaging events, like losses and traumas, should be used to make us stronger. Resilience is a property of the strong and powerful, who abide by Nietzsche’s dictum “what doesn’t kill me make me stronger”, a widespread citation in meme cultures that transposes the coaching vision of constant internal struggle against adversity into everyday parlance. Resilient people need to stay positive, as positivity “constitutes a ‘bufer’ against adversity, giving the feeling of being someone competent, who cannot be ‘crushed’ by the world”, as Illouz puts it, like reactive and elastic materials that will be enduring whatever attempts to crush them (2020: 84). Discourses on resilience “call on people to be adaptable and positive, ‘bounce back’ from adversity, and embrace a mindset in which negative experiences must be reframed in upbeat terms” (Organ and Gill, 2022: 17), that is to absorb, convert, and repurpose negative occurrences into shields for the future well-being.\n\nAssessing whether coaching discourses may (or may not) work for individuals or social groups is not the point here; the point is instead to place the curatorial imperative within the cultures it harvests and, given its immense popularity, the “truths” it gives rise to in the broader social space. The key truths of the coaching narrative prey on common interpellations of neoliberal ideology and specifically on what Julie Wilson calls a “self-enclosed individualism” (2018: 6). As AnaLouise Keating (2012) puts it:\n\nSelf-enclosed individualism relies on a dichotomous framework that positions the individual in opposition to all other human and nonhuman beings. (“It’s me against the world.”) In this binary-oppositional structure, each individual is entirely separate from the external world. Self and society are mutually exclusive; to survive and thrive, each person must focus almost entirely on herself, evaluating all actions in egocentric terms: “What’s in it for me?” “How can I succeed?” “How will this event, this situation, afect me?” “What can you do for me?” “What can I take from you?\n\n(quoted in Wilson 2017: 4)\n\n144\n\nCultures of Platform Capitalism","previous_page":143,"next_page":145}